|
| If we want states to thumb noses at over-reaching federal law,
this is a good baby step. And a good one. Here's a sign of GOP
squalor, however.
|
| “
|
Meanwhile,
Republicans desperate to head off a second term for RNC Chairman
Michael S. Steele ... a highlight of the (recent RNC)
meeting was his smothering opponents' hopes of embarrassing him with a
no-confidence vote.
| ” |
Desperate? Yes. But what's the problem? I would think Steele's ouster a foregone conclusion. His
allies in the GOP are the braniacs who allowed the New York Times, and
democrat cross-voters in the primaries to shackle us with John
McCain. Any resurgence of GOP prospects this fall are entirely
due to Tea Partiers, not, no, despite Michael Steele's GOP.
|
|
Mheh ...
ReplyDeleteFirst, break all rules. Second, turned out it didn't matter that we had a darkie too, so go ahead and deep six Token Steel. Moving on, this way folks.....
ReplyDeleteNo offense to the good people of New Hampshire, but I'm sick to death of hearing the name "New Hampshire" in connection with primaries. Who died and made them the kingmakers? Same goes for Iowa, the Holy Ground for the ethanol subsidy. Drop both those states from the early primaries.
ReplyDeletePlease.
The RNC saddled us with McCain after one single states primary. The RNC didn't need any primaries to pick the loser. I knew he would lose.
ReplyDeleteMaybe if the RNC allows more than half the primaries to take place before announcing the winner it would at least appear as if the primaries served some purpose. Adn we would have an opportunity to discover who people will really vote for instead of telling everyone what they will vote for.