Guilty of not doing nothing

Usual Suspect Rules Obamacare Constitutional

“ Even though ObamaCare is a novel application of the Commerce Clause because it regulates the act of not engaging in economic activity, the judge concluded that in reality the Commerce Clause power extends to all economic decisions that affect commerce. He also argued that a person can not guarantee that he or she will opt out of the health care market. -TAS ”

Federal Judge George Steeh Rejects Challenge To Key Elements Of Health Care Law Let's put aside for a moment that US District Court Judge George Steeh was recommended for the bench by Senator Carl Levin was  appointed by Bill Clinton.  is president of the Arab American Bar Association is a social activist, including being an active member of the Interfaith Council for Racial Justice (one of which guiding principles is, ironically, Opposing political power that is derived from a racist appeal) Has a history of basing far reaching decisions on "feel good" emanations. Forget all that.  How in the hell do you bend the Commerce Clause pretzel,  yet again,  to regulate the act of not engaging in economic activity?  Arguing that a person can not guarantee that he or she won't do something? I am in the school that thinks removing (impeaching) activist judges ought be the single highest priority of congress.  This guy is a poster boy candidate for inclusion. This is just one suit, and a relatively minor one at that.  Here's a clearing house site for all suits being brought against Obamacare, US District Court Judge George Steeh