|
A temporary restraining order has been
issued to block a state constitutional amendment that prohibits state
courts from considering international or Islamic law when deciding
cases. Because, God knows, it's constitutionally self evident,
and in the nation's best interest to give every half-assed interest
group its own legal system.
|
|
All I needed to see was the hyphenated last name. Almost always a dem.
ReplyDeleteTim
If it makes no sence,
ReplyDeleteif it turns the world on it's head,
if it serves to weaken the fabric of America,
it is a Democrat judge that will approve of it.
RAK
Of course they expected this. I'm told they specifically mentioned sharia law to call out the fight into the street. After all, the law says no judge shall use foreign law (which would mean sharia as well) so they were a bit redundant by intent. They also voted in that English is the official language of the state and all State business will be done in English. Keep in mind, Oklahoma passed the Arizona immigration law two years before AZ. They finally got a Republican Governor as well.
ReplyDeleteBOOMER!
Bitch outta be stoned....
ReplyDeleteWha?..she was?
R. Don Fohrdems
'Cause them over-edumacated liberal judges ALWAYS know better than the electorate....
ReplyDeleteI would argue that we need to start electing federal judges to 8 year terms.
ReplyDeleteUS Constitution, Article VI (2nd para):
ReplyDelete"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwith-standing."
That help any, Judge?
Another product of EEO madness. She probably bought her law degree at Walmart.
ReplyDeleteFrom Wiki "A native of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Miles-LaGrange, received a certificate from the University of Ghana in Accra, Ghana, West Africa in 1973"
ReplyDeleteWell GawwwwwLeeeee!
Anony, it did mention sharia specifically, but also 'other religious or cultural law', can't remember the exact wording.
ReplyDeleteIt also specifically said 'foreign and international LAW', so the clown's claim of 'no secular purpose' is bullshit. 'Course, he is with CAIR, so what do we expect?