A Woman from ACP, identified by Solve
Climate News as Allie Carter, a recent Michigan State University
graduate (AC): I don’t understand why my generation has to
suffer because it sounds like you’re not liking what you are hearing
from these scientists you’re cherry picking.
JI: So your generation — Now who are
you with?
AC: I’m with the Alliance for Climate
Protection and I am here speaking on behalf young people.
JI: …No
you’re not!
AC: I absolutely am.
JI: I have twenty kids and grand
kids. You want to see a picture of them? [pulls out pictures]. Okay
that’s good.
Inhofe then proceeded to calmly explain that the United
States cannot sink its economy to satisfy the unproven hypotheses of a
mixed group of scientists and activists.
|
I am not sure about "turns the table on" as much as much as gave a polite and well reasoned response to. Inhofe seems to be practicing the new civility the left demands of the rest of us.
ReplyDeleteThe scientific method requires observations, forming a hypothesis which explains the observations, performing experimentation with predictions based on hypothesis and modifying the hypothesis based on the results of the experimentation.
AGW is based on observations and computer modeling designed to fit the preconceived hypothesis. Rather than being able to design experiments, the scientists so cavalierly treated their raw data that it is not available to others who might want to check their work.
How about asking Breitbart to offer a cash prize to any modeler who can take the data up to 1990, plug it into their programs and predict the last 20 years without changing any of the fudge factors they have built into their model?
It would not prove anything but would show us who seems to have the best model.
Laurence
"It's not personal"
ReplyDeleteThat sounds a lot like
"No pressure!" = we hate you and wish we could kill you where you stand.