| “
|
In the course of my inquiries
into many of history's more recent controversies -- JFK, Waco, Vince
Foster, Oklahoma City, Ron Brown, TWA Flight 800, 9/11, Obama's birth,
the authorship of Obama's books -- I have come to see that when there
are actual conspiracies afoot, they fall into two general categories,
conspiracies of execution and conspiracies of concealment.
Conspiracies
of execution, at least on any kind of scale, are rare in American
history. The nature of our national character and the openness of
our political culture war against them.
Conspiracies of
concealment are another matter. When officials fail in their
duties and let, say, a president get shot, a plane get blown out of the
sky, or a hijacker fly into a building, their first impulse is to
conceal their mistakes. Such is human nature.
To me, a
"conspiracy theorist" is one who sees a conspiracy of execution where
none could logically exist or who confuses a conspiracy of concealment
with one of execution despite ample evidence to the contrary.
Given this
understanding, it is the rare "birther" who qualifies as a conspiracy
theorist. Few have conjured elaborate, impossible conspiracies on
the scale Oliver Stone did in JFK or the French leftist
Theirry Meyssan and others did with 9/11. [cont]
|
” |
If THE WON's birth certificate is a non-issue, then produce the damn thing. I had to provide a copy of my birth certificate when I applied for my retired teacher's pension. It. Was. Not. A. Big. Deal.
ReplyDeleteAre Birthers paranoid? I don't know. I do know that continued avoidance by THE WON only fuels speculation and lends creditibility to the assumed paranoia.
If there's nothing to hide, then open the records. Hell, even ChimpyMcHitlerHaliburtonBush made his records available for public examination.
Brigadier Major Mike
Recovering History Teacher
"If there's nothing to hide, then open the records."
ReplyDeleteWell put, Mike.
I agree completely.
If this involved a Republican, there would be Congressional committees on the issue.
The same notion (of opening public records which support a governmental contention or story) applies to the JFK assassination.
The Warren Commission concluded in 1964 that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating JFK.
But the House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded in 1977 or 1978 that Oswald likeley acted in collusion (i.e. in a conspiracy) with others in perpetrating the assassination.
Thus, we have 2 governmental findings which are compeletly contradictory.
And yet the Federal government continues to withhold hundreds of thousand of pages of records on the JFK assassination that it is supposedly going to release in 2017.
I hope to be around in 2017, but I am not expecting the Federal government to be forthcoming at that time.
Nor am I ever expecting to see Obama's Hawaii birth certificate, like the incoming Governor has promised.