John and Mary
are spoiled Gen-X brats who are used to having stuff now. While John earns a mid six-figure
income, they are drowning in debt. Finally, unable to
sleep at night, they've decided to
get a grip. They'll have to sell their home in Potomac, MD and
move to Prince George's County, where homes are cheaper and his
commute to work much shorter. Their daughters, age 13 and 15, are
still crying hysterically as we speak with the news that Bullis Prep is
out, and public school in. Mary, a proliferate spender,
sobs as well while taking scissors to about a dozen credit cards.
Depending on what their home sells for, John figures that they can
become solvent in from 5 to 8 years. He calls his mortgage
company, bank, credit card companies and other debtors and petitions
them. He assures that monthly interest payments will be paid
promptly, with payment on the principal rationed for the time
being. Here's the responses.
The Mortgage Holder: "Yes, but only
if you take out a third mortgage with us."
The
Credit Card Company: "Yes, but only if you increase your average
monthly purchases,"
The
Car Loan Company: "Yes, but only if you trade in for a
new Mercedes S600 sedan."
Mookys
Rating Se vice: Unless you take out additional loans in
order to keep spending up, your credit rating will be lowered and
you'll have to get credit from Crazy Al's Finance.
Ridiculous? Of course. So explain this
to me.
| “
|
With rating
agencies warning about downgrading the United States’ credit, which
could lead to a surge in interest rates and a shock to the markets, (if
the debt limit isn't raised)
|
” |
Am I missing
something? I'm not the only one at sea here, pretty sure of
that. Remember, we
are in good shape when it comes to meeting our interest obligations -
as long as we sell the Mercedes, send the kids to public school, and
quit hiring pool-boys and French chefs. So
what's with the threats from ratings services like Moodys and
S&P? Raise your debt limit or else ... .?
Real Question
|
I'm delighted Reid was very angry. Must mean Boehner wants to do the right thing and Dirty Harry sees great danger to his party's future vote buying and his supporters' rent seeking. I hope Reid has a stroke. In a nice way of course.
ReplyDeleteBTW; Harry, go fuck yourself. You don't get to spend my money anymore. Nasty message to follow.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
durty harry reid, dazed unfocussed former boxer, the acute head/brain trauma is now very obvious at this point in his pointless political life. hairy is very generous with other people's money, and he obviously doesn't give a shit about their children since he is saddling them with big gov debts to tko wreck their futures. thanks a lot, punch drunk dummy.
ReplyDeleteWhy is Boner putting together a new plan at all? This seems like a step backwards to me.
ReplyDeleteI say we cut all the congress critters pay and benefits, pushed back to about January 1, 2010 (as they really should have had this settled by then) and not give them a dime, or any benefits (up to and including personal flights on tax payer funded airplanes) until they get this fixed and fixed correctly. After all, they work for us supposedly and we are their bosses, in theory. This is what I would do to an employee who wasn't getting their job done on time.
ReplyDeleteJudging from the crying and the screaming from the left and the crony capitalists, old Bonher may be doing something at least half way right. I think Reid is facing a problem in the Senate if he tries to muster up enough votes for another turn down of a House bill from nervous Democrats who are up for re-election in 2012. If enough get on with the Republicans to pass a bill with provisions of another debate on debt limits just before scheduled in 2012 they are in trouble, if Obambi vetoes as passed bill they are in trouble. If they don't pass a bill they are still in trouble. They have to figure out how much trouble and what to do about Obambi's posturing and veto threats. I need more popcorn.
ReplyDeleteI'll try and answer my own question ..
ReplyDelete—What the rating services are saying have been misrepresented?
—The rating services are afraid that if we cut spending by reducing the size of government there will be less money to buy things?
—Rating services are owned by the United Nation?
Srsly, how can we be downgraded for trying to balance the books? As long as we don't default?
Teresa, you're an economics guru. What? Cuzzin Ricky? What. Star Banker?
Don't overlook the most dangerous person in this whole drama: Turbo Tax Timmy, O'Spendalot's Treasury Secretary. Yesterday, when asked by Chris Wallace what his plan is for handling his responsibilities post-default, Timmy said he has no plan, other than to scare recipients of government checks by saying that the "Congress" (read Republicans) are threatening their payments. Not only does he have no plan,and no plan to make plans (to paraphrase Mario Cuomo), he refuses to acknowledge that he will have sufficient resources at his disposal to ensure that those people continue to receive their money. We should all remember that Geithner has a history of gamesmanship with the US economy and other peoples' money (having presided over the demise of Lehman Brothers, the catalyst for the 2008financial meltdown, as President of the NY Fed and having delayed paying his overdue taxes for several years after being informed of Turbo Tax's mistakes in advising him). Jim Cramer, not exactly a member of the VWRC, warned us about this years ago: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=922748841.
ReplyDeleteMoody's and S&P rate ONLY the investment reliability of US debt instruments, ie. T-Bond, Bills and Notes.
ReplyDeleteWill interest and redemptions continue to be promptly paid in full? Yes, as required by law and irrespective of the current political moonshine.
Why do they need to raise the debt ceiling?
ReplyDeleteHaven't they stolen enough of our money already?
Ratings agencies, in particular Fitch, Moody's and Standard and Poors have been implicitly allowed by governments to fill a quasi-regulatory role. In addition, they are regulated by the SEC, and were threated by the SEC with a monopoly investigation after the last credit meltdown. Do you really think these are independent rating agencies? Do you think big business (owned by McGraw Hill and Dun and Bradstreet) are not in bed with the government?
ReplyDeleteLuigi Palmieri
Just what I suspected. F'm.
ReplyDelete