|
| “
|
Someone was
incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to
the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at
Justia.com which cite the only case in American history - Minor v.
Happersett (1875) - to directly construe Article 2 Section 1's
natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part
of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the
Supreme Court defined a "native or natural-born citizen" as a person
born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which
excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain.
Note
that the shenanigans began in June.
| “
|
By
Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday,
May 2, 2008
The Senate has unanimously declared
John McCain a natural-born citizen, eligible to be president of the
United States.
|
” |
June was the month that questions about Barry's birth caused his
handlers to begin a series of fraudulent document creation that
persists today. I'm just saying.
Look at how, what's the word? "Reckless." How almost
hysterically reckless the mission was
carried out. Just a year prior Clinton's former national security
adviser Sandy Berger stole and evidently destroyed
original, uncatalogued,
highly classified terrorism (Clinton Admin) documents from the National
Archives. This
was just prior to the Senate's 9-11 Commission hearings. I'm
suggesting
that Democrats will do ANYTHING when exposure of their
failings, misdeeds, or felonies are to be exposed. Ahem.
|
Meanwhile, at
the “Supreme Court Center” of the influential legal research
website Justia.com, efforts were underway corrupting at least 25
Supreme Court cases by erasing references to the words "Minor V.
Happersett" along with references to other relevant cases on the issue
along with the insertion of misleading numerical ciations. And In
two documented cases actual text was removed.
Clearly this was
done in these specific cases in order to prevent their being found by
internet researchers long before anyone had even begun to look for
them, even before Obama would win the Democratic Nomination at the
DNC Convention in Denver, Colorado in August '08. This is premeditation
and intent to deceive.
So far, 25
corrupted SCOTUS have been identified, and this number may continue to
rise as the scope of the tampering becomes apparent. [Read
the full story]
It goes without saying
that this will be Sixty-Minutes'
headline feature tonight. Unless CBS, like me, are certain this
is an Obama crime. Then, nothing. Let's wait and see.
|
” |
Nice catch stoo-pid
|
Only problem is that this case does not say that a natural born citizen is exclusively a child born in the US of two American citizens. It says there is no doubt that such a child is natural born and then goes on to say there are possibly other categories. It does not definitively state that those other categories are not natural born - it simply does not address the question. Thus the Court did not address the status of someone born outside the US to two American citizen parents or someone born in the US whose parents were not citizens.
ReplyDeleteHowever, as one of the comments at the bottom of the linked article points out, real lawyers do not use Justia for legal research - they typically use Lexis or Westlaw so altering the records on this database would seem pointless.
.
The cancer can not be removed by the ballot.
ReplyDelete"Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts." Minor v. Happersett, 88 US 162, 167-68 (1875).
ReplyDeleteJustia isn't just some hack-job website. They are highly respected. If someone has been doing this at Justia, then kneecapping is too good for them.
It seems to me that the crime lies in altering, and misdirecting the rule of law. What was altered is beside the point, although somebody thought natural-born citizen clause precedent was pretty damned important. Ahem. Wouldn't you agree?
ReplyDeleteRodger, following up on my first post I'd agree that "editing" Justia raises some interesting questions. Most importantly, why would someone bother doing that when they can't modify Lexis? [Whether those modifications are actually "criminal" is a separate question. Unethical definitely. Illegal? Who knows. Depends who did it and what sort of authorizations they did or did not have.
ReplyDelete.
Okay, that sounds "legal" - I'm not selling anything here, so it is whatever it is. Just like every other little thing "Obama", taken as a whole.
ReplyDeleteThe O was born. That's natural. Therefore, he's a citizen.
ReplyDeleteU.K.L. Lee
A search on justia.com for "memory hole" - in the Orwellian sense obviously, does not pop up it's own use of the memory hole.
ReplyDeleteApparently the motivation was to keep internet sleuths from accessing "Minor v. Happersett."
ReplyDeleteMy money is on Moveon.org or, most prolly, KOS (who introduced the first fraudulent COLB).
...this is why we have "hard copy". Many of them. So the bastards have to hunt them down and fight for them before they burn them.
ReplyDeleteHopefully, they'll be killed in the fight before there a burning.
T/W: sable ...somehow seems appropriate.