CBS Aks Itself ...

A Plaintiff's Cry “ FULL The Lame-stream media reluctance to report anything negative about anything Democrat just got more bizarre.  Here they more or less ask themselves "at what point do we do what we're supposed to?" At what point does this become a story beyond Fox News? Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later was denied by U.S. officials — who [...] This comment pretty much says it all: Abbey Cavanuagh · Top Commenter Just read today's Washington Post. Nothing on the front page. Did a word search, a brief mention about 3 weeks ago. Shameful. The media is going to pay for the last 5 years propping Obama up...and this...THIS is unbelievable that they are tamping down on a story of such importance. What I want to know is WHY the Ambassador was set up, and that is exactly what it looks like, even if you just look at the little bit out that's available on the web. To me, and of course, I'm guessing like everybody else that cares, it looks like the Egyptian Brotherhood was going to kidnap the Ambassador in exchange for the Blind Sheik. Those two heroes that finally ignored the stand down order JUST GOT IN THE WAY of a planned kidnapping. Gee, ya think Obama had something to do with this? Oh, and by the way, we might not have to guess if the MEDIA DID IT'S JOB. Other comments IF George Bush had done these things, what else would be on the front pages but this before the election? There is something beneath this story of such profound significance that they are going to such extremes to hide the truth. What was it? A gun running operation?   Now that it's all over for the Obamas, look for CBS's Sixty Minutes, which has assiduously avoided any negative reporting on Obama, to start getting on the record (just as they did with Bill Clinton— after he'd been impeached).  ”