scream-of-consciousness;
"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Pages
▼
Saturday, October 27, 2012
IT WAS OBAMA!
BUMPED UP from 10/27 8:59 PM
BOMBSHELL: US troops in Benghazi would not have been painting targets
on the ground unless there was air support overhead. see GATEWAY
PUNDIT
“
"I'm giving you a lot of inside baseball
stuff, and maybe
putting myself in peril for doing it, but In Extremis Force was
turnd down by POTUS at his 5PM Eastern time meeting .."
This Benghazi thing is breaking six ways to Sunday. What is absolutely
for certain is that Obama, Biden and Hillary, the top three officials
in an in extremis force
situation, are either so staggeringly incompetent as to be criminally
negligent, or worse; were actively working for and with the
Islamos who killed the Stevens group. There is no third possibility.
It is also unquestionable that Obama has lied at every juncture of
Benghazi, and continues to this day.
This is one of the damnedest phone calls Rush has ever taken. The
caller—unquestionably an insider, lays out why its a certainty that the
POTUS THREE are singularly responsible for this debacle.
God help us. The lefties that took out the full page ad in the New York Times calling him "General Betrayus" were right. If he hasn't already ascertained the truth in this (unlikely), why hasn't he publicly tendered his resignation and come forward with exact details?
Although Russia figures prominently here, Iran now comes into focus as Russia is not likely to directly engage U.S. forces. They must, however, protect their interests. Much like we were using anti-Assad forces to advance our objectives in Syria, Russia was using Iranian-backed forces to protect theirs. It appears that the attacks were conducted or facilitated by Iranian assets—perhaps as many as three teams of assets in Benghazi.
As the White House and other agencies monitored intelligence in real-time, they faced a dilemma. They knew that the nation/state sponsored attack teams were lying in wait for U.S. rescue forces to arrive, which is the reason the fight did not conclusively end sooner. They did not know exactly where all of the attack teams were, but knew they were present based on signal communication intercepts. Could they risk such exposure by deploying a rescue team to Benghazi, only to end up with another Black Hawk down type scenario? In addition to that scenario, the entire operation now becomes exposed for what it is. Take another look at Panetta’s statement in that context. Does it now make more sense? Bad PR in an election year, no? [Canada Free Press]
"They knew that the nation/state sponsored attack teams were lying in wait for U.S. rescue forces to arrive, which is the reason the fight did not conclusively end sooner."
A few Primed and ready Special Forces Killers with a gunship overhead providing cover is enough to take the entire shit hole of a country.
If the Republicans don't put somebody's half black ass in jail over this.....
When I saw the pictures of the terrorists holding Ambassador Stevens’ body, I thought to myself, ”this is how I felt when I saw the terrorists in Mogadishu dragging the body of SFC Shughart through the streets of Mogadishu.
But while that incident pegged my rage meter—I knew Randy Schugart, we were in the same platoon at the 2d Ranger Bn before he went to SFOD-D—as more details were uncovered, I realized that wasn’t what Benghazi reminded me of.
The footage of the burning consulate at Benghazi reminded me of how I felt watching the compound outside of Waco going up in flames, and the anger of knowing that our government had just murdered 84 of its own citizens. And the sickening feeling that nothing would ever be done about it.
This by the way, is how an actual journalist ought conduct an interview.
ReplyDeleteAbsentee ballots sent to U.S. military serving in Afghanistan 'destroyed in crash'...">(Drudge)
ReplyDeleteCue Captain Renault.
ReplyDeleteTim
Deadly fecklessness.
ReplyDeleteOur affirmative action president is a punk.
ReplyDeleteDougM was in San Antonio?
ReplyDeleteGod help us. The lefties that took out the full page ad in the New York Times calling him "General Betrayus" were right. If he hasn't already ascertained the truth in this (unlikely), why hasn't he publicly tendered his resignation and come forward with exact details?
ReplyDeleteA thoroughly sickened
Webrider
FRIDAY: Obama rebuts claims he’s lying about attack on US Consulate in Libya
ReplyDeleteThe thought occurred to me just now - maybe the question is, "Why did Obama want the Ambassador dead?"
ReplyDeleteOr, am I out of line here??
Petraeus Throws Obama Under the Bus
ReplyDeleteAlthough Russia figures prominently here, Iran now comes into focus
ReplyDeleteas Russia is not likely to directly engage U.S. forces. They must,
however, protect their interests. Much like we were using
anti-Assad forces to advance our objectives in Syria, Russia was using
Iranian-backed forces to protect theirs. It appears that the
attacks were conducted or facilitated by Iranian assets—perhaps as many
as three teams of assets in Benghazi.
As the White House and other agencies monitored intelligence in
real-time, they faced a dilemma. They knew that the nation/state
sponsored attack teams were lying in wait for U.S. rescue forces to
arrive, which is the reason the fight did not conclusively end sooner.
They did not know exactly where all of the attack teams were, but knew
they were present based on signal communication intercepts. Could they
risk such exposure by deploying a rescue team to Benghazi, only to end
up with another Black Hawk down type scenario? In addition to that
scenario, the entire operation now becomes exposed for what it is. Take
another look at Panetta’s statement in that context. Does it now make
more sense? Bad PR in an election year, no? [Canada
Free Press]
"They knew that the nation/state
ReplyDeletesponsored attack teams were lying in wait for U.S. rescue forces to
arrive, which is the reason the fight did not conclusively end sooner."
A few Primed and ready Special Forces Killers with a gunship overhead providing cover is enough to take the entire shit hole of a country.
If the Republicans don't put somebody's half black ass in jail over this.....
DougT,
ReplyDeleteNot me. I was an AF satellite guy, and my joint-staff time was not directly SF-related.
Waaaiiit … how do we know this wasn't you? Huh? Huh?
MMMPOS, a category I hadn't put at mine until this morning. I thought I knew what hate was before. I was wrong.
ReplyDeleteWhen I saw the pictures of the terrorists holding Ambassador Stevens’ body, I thought to myself, ”this is how I felt when I saw the terrorists in Mogadishu dragging the body of SFC Shughart through the streets of Mogadishu.
ReplyDeleteBut while that incident pegged my rage meter—I knew Randy Schugart, we were in the same platoon at the 2d Ranger Bn before he went to SFOD-D—as more details were uncovered, I realized that wasn’t what Benghazi reminded me of.
The footage of the burning consulate at Benghazi reminded me of how I felt watching the compound outside of Waco going up in flames, and the anger of knowing that our government had just murdered 84 of its own citizens. And the sickening feeling that nothing would ever be done about it.
I was raised to not HATE anyone....
ReplyDeleteThis evil bastard has made me hate someone for the first time in my life....
The ONLY other person I came close top hating was the asshat who murdered my sister.
ReplyDeleteCondolences, Darla. To all of us.
ReplyDeleteYes, Barry0 has stolen a bit of our humanity. The past 4 years has certainly threatened my Redemption as well.