| “
|
Merrily
has the Ruger comparison on her Facebook. It reminded me of a
similar
post I did several years ago on Free Republic, I think. Here's me
in
the early twentieth century holding my dad's old Stevens .22
semi-auto. It held somewhere around 18 .22 shorts, or 14 .22
longs as
I recall. How does this become an assault rifle, according to
Sen. Feinstien? By
lowering the front end, adding mud flaps and "spinner"
hubcaps. You
stupid twat.
Is this a valid argument. Indeed. Do valid arguments— about
anything—hold sway with Liberals on a mission? Nope. Which
is why we need more
of these "assault rifles" in the hands of people with functioning
brains.
|
|
” |
|
It's cuz it is black. Them racists!
ReplyDeleteThe second is more scary than the first. First we ban the scary stuff, and when we are feeing better, we'll ban the less scary stuff.
ReplyDeleteA couple of things come to mind. My first weapon, at about 13 was a Ruger 10/22. I put thousands of rounds through it, and learned marksmanship. The truly vicious variant is when you saw the barrel off, and the stock, add a couple of those 100 rd mags, and shoot up a post office, like that guy did in OK or thereabouts a decade ago.
ReplyDeleteCasca
Very good trigger discipline for a youth of that era.
ReplyDeleteLike calling a fiberglass body on a VW frame an exotic Italian supercar.
ReplyDelete