| “
|
All
federal acts, laws, orders, rules, and regulations, whether past,
present, or future, which infringe on the people’s right to keep and
bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States
Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution
shall be invalid in this state, shall not be recognized by this state,
shall be specifically rejected by this state, and shall be considered
null and void and of no effect in this state.
And
what’s even better is that the measure is backed by a veto-proof
majority. This means that as long as those representatives that
supported it initially are willing to support it again (in the case of
a veto from the Governor), it will become law on July 1, regardless of
what the Governor does or doesn’t do.
Kansas was brave enough to take the lead in the fight against federal
gun control. And now the Kansas Governor and Secretary of State are
duking it out with Eric the “Fast and Furious.”
But Missouri’s bill is even better (in part):
Read
more:
Meanwhile-Biden
Wants Pastors To Preach Gun Control |
|
” |
We in Tennessee have a bunch of pu$$ie$ in the state legislature. This came up but was argued against. I guess all the real men went to Texas with Crockett (except for me).
ReplyDeletewildbill
Annon: I will be back as of Friday. So, there's more than one of you.
ReplyDeleteWon't happen in Oregon. While lots of us like the 2nd Amendment here, our political masters like Washington and all its works. It's where they hope to go live. Hey, it's just bidness with them.
ReplyDeleteWashington will bitch, wring their hands, threaten and realize they've awakened a sleeping giant.
ReplyDeletePeople have had enough and the states are where it starts.
Holder will undoubtedly go to Obama for some kind of "executive action."
ReplyDeletePlus, BATFE will bureaucrat the heck out'a this.
On the surface, this poses question of primacy (Fed law trumps State law); and that's how it will be spun in the media and the chattering classes.
However, there's no primacy for unconstitutional acts, so the real issue may be who decides the constitutionality of an act?
The Constitution doesn't actually say. The Supreme Court declared that it does, but that might come into question as a result of State nullifications as they insist on their rightful retained sovereignty (the disgraced term "States' rights").
Stockin' up on popcorn, here, boss.
wildbill +1.
ReplyDeleteTennessee can't even pass a decent parking lot bill, and that's WITH a "R" supermajority. Pretty bad when Arkysaw has to show them the way re: gun rights.
(spit)
I tried to post this article on a blog I had at a site called bravenet, as soon as I did they deleted my account.
ReplyDeleteThe name of the country is: "The United States of America."
ReplyDeleteThe name of the country is not: "America, with an all-powerful federal government in Washington and 50 insignificant political subdivisions."
Act accordingly.
The state of Missery just gave every concealed carry D/l number to the Feds. Mo and Ks have a big socialist past all the way back to John Brown and abolitionist colonies. I hope they are coming around.
ReplyDeleteA couple of scuds in the back forty on mobile launchers, and that NORK pipsqueak starts really looking like a pipsqueak. Plus we can feed ourselves.
ReplyDeleteCasca
sadly, some of us live in hell. and can't afford to leave.
ReplyDeletein our House of Reps in Trenton, this is the kind of evil they are up to:
http://www.politickernj.com/back_room/confiscate-confiscate-confiscate
Headlines we'd like to see:
ReplyDeleteEric Holder Shot Resisting Arrest on Civil Rights Charges
Woon't that cause heads to explode in newsrooms across the nation?