| “
|
I am not
kidding when I say this. Dyed in the wool leftists often cannot grasp
why government would lie. They simply give government officials,
particularly "theirs" the benefit of the doubt. It defies belief. But
in as much as they defend "theirs" they hate "yours." Leftists always
think they know your agenda.
Hillary
could care less who Bill screws around with- that was never
important
to her. What is important to Hillary is her ego and ambition. I have
always believed the whole marriage, kid, thing was just a cover story
for a Presidential run or two. There are now rumblings that in
Hillary's upcoming book, she is going to disclose that she is
bi-sexual. So after 4 decades, maybe the truth will come
out.
Whenever I am debating an issue, let's say in the case
of
the
Congressional Budget Office's allegation that this year's deficit will
only be 642 billion, I stick to the facts. Generally what happens is
this. a) Intelligent people realize when they are wrong or at the very
least, when they have been mislead. They will go quiet. b) Every once
in awhile, I actually have a decent back and forth discussion with an
intelligent person without name calling. This causes me to re-think or
reinforce a position with fact checking. It happened last week. c) Most
often some ego maniac will start calling you names when you disagree
with some unsubstantiated position that they have taken. When they
start calling you names, you win. It is always that simple.
The single greatest conflict generator of my
entire
life is
Barack Obama. I have never ever seen an individual more adept at lying
than this guy. He is a pure professional. When I see his particular
quality of deception- I am in awe. Even when caught in a lie,
Obama
simply shuts up. Thus he gives the detracting side no credibility and
no power- knowing full well the issue will fade. Benghazi, and where he
was during that 7 hours, is a perfect example. He has never addressed
the issue.
The reason that Obama causes so much conflict is because he is so damn
good at being deceptive. Bush was a piker compared to this guy. Even
ardent conservatives had to agree that Bush was a shitty liar. So Bush
didn't generate the kind of entrenched conflict that Obama does. It
doesn't hurt that Obama is black either. Supporters will often use the
race card anytime they are losing a debate involving Obama.
I don't think I have ever researched anyone
more thoroughly
than Obama. I certainly have never researched anyone, anywhere, who is
a bigger enigma than this guy. His entire life makes no sense to me.
Let me tell you a little story which will make sense
once
you think about it. Hillary Clinton, while in college, ...
(thecivillibertarian continied)
|
” |
Liberalism is the hope that the most rotten of people, and agendas, somehow have a good quality and it will persevere over the evil.
ReplyDeleteIn the real world, that hope is called insanity.
I'm not as hopeful as the writer that we'll get any more information about the man than we have now. He had a lot of help staying in the shadows his entire adult life to the point of being elected head of the most information intensive government in history. What's going change?
ReplyDeleteTo Progs (and all other despotic types), words are just tools for acquiring and maintaining power. Truth, reason, honor, etc. are immaterial; and they may, indeed, be a downright impediment. If something should be true or needs to be true at a point in time, then it is. Truth is relative and temporary.
ReplyDeleteSince their ends are the ultimate morality, any means they use to reach those ends must, therefore, be moral.
"Since their ends are the ultimate morality, any means they use to reach those ends must, therefore, be moral."
ReplyDeleteI think I'm losing it. After reading that the first thing I though of was a poster of a fine bouquet of female rear ends with the caption:
"The ends justify the means."
I apologize. I used to be better than that.
It is bad enough that The Komrade Mother-f***ing Prevaricator-in-Chief is constantly bullshitting us, but it is especially galling that he actually expects us to believe it.
ReplyDeleteScottiebill
Speaking of lying bastards,
ReplyDeletethis made my blood boil. Excusing themselves from a law that was enacted precisely because of their actions:
http://ncrenegade.com/editorial/a-representative-republic-no-more/
Speaking of Hillary in college, my wife worked with a woman who was in her sorority and she confirmed that the Beast played for more than one team...
ReplyDeleteA friend's daughter attended one of those very tony pony girl colleges (half the girls boarded their horses there) in Virginia. I was at their their home one weekend when she had a bunch of her classmates for the weekend. One of them told how she had interned for the Children’s Defense Fund the previous summer (in 1991), and that Hillary was notorious for "hitting on" the volunteer staff. When I asked if she was going to vote for Bill Clinton in November she replied "of course." Hillary is not "bi," she's lesbo. And a liar. And a crook.
ReplyDeleteReal, actual conversation with a liberal at a party:
ReplyDelete"Republicans are just racists."
What about Herman Caine, is he a racist?"
"Herman Caine just wants to sell books."
"I believe I could use another drink. Excues me."
Liberals are incapable of debating the merits of their positions because they are emotional, not logical. It's like debating ones favorite color.
ReplyDeleteTim
"...Liberals are incapable of debating the merits of their positions because they are emotional, not logical. It's like debating ones favorite color..."
ReplyDelete...with Rain Man.
That's exactly right, Tim. That's why they consider using facts and reason in an argument to be cheating and probably racist. It's also why they avoid the truth whenever possible. They instinctively know that the truth is never on their side and thus is dangerous to them.
ReplyDeleteGrinfilledCelt