Last
Week Maj. Gen. Michael Carey was personally removed
by Obama “due to a loss of trust and
confidence in his leadership and judgment.” Gen. Carey is by
my count the 6th Flag Officer
removed by Obama in the past few years; three of them had personal knowledge of the Benghazi
affair. Carey was in charge of the units responsible
for its 450 nuclear missiles. What's going on? And don't
say nothing.
Is there a real life Seven Days in
May scenario brewing? It sure as hell wouldn't
surprise me. Here are some comments that resonated with me.
Note that all of them cited are from
the Brit press.
Peter Kirby, San
Rafael, United States, 1 hour ago (Daily Mail):
Does anyone
believe
this garbage? First, a top nuclear commander is fired for 'using
counterfeit poker chips.' Then, another gets fired because of
'alcoholism?' Give me a break. Does anybody look at the Alex Jones
website? A.J. has been reporting for about a month that nukes were
moved from Dyess AFB. The first nuclear commander was fired on THE DAY
the nukes reportedly left the base. Wake up people! This thing stinks
to high heaven!!!
Emma,
London, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago (Daily Mail):
If you google
how
many top level US military commanders have been removed, sacked,
demoted and killed it is truly frightening and what is just as worrying
is that the media is complicit in its lack of coverage.The litmus test
for Generals now is will they order troops to fire on US citizens, if
they refuse somehow they will be removed (I'm not buying that one - it would leak and
could not be ignored)
EngageBrainFirst,
Graham, United States, 1 hour ago (Daily Mail):
Okay, we have a
Navy
Admiral and an Army General relieved "for cause" during the "phony
scandal" of Benghazi. Now we have Air Force Generals in charge of nukes
relieved "for cause" because of gambling and alcohol, not to mention
all the others out there. Why is Obama and his minions going after the
US military's senior leadership? There's something that 1) he's afraid
of about them 2) he's planning something. Neither choice is very
soothing to my worries. More to follow...
I'm not alarmed by any particular plot just yet, but the question
we must ask, right NOW, is this. Are Obama's actions,
before and
since becoming president ("My
Military"), consistent with someone capable of capitol
treason against the United State?. Yes or no? If yes, and
how could
it be otherwise, then who but the military can stop him? And they
know it. I'm just saying. He has to be watched very carefully
with this threat in mind, because ... .
|
They can have the generals on their side. On my side, I would much rather have enlisted men, and lower ranked officers. They are the ones that actually know which buttons and levers to push, and are still young enough for combat.
ReplyDeleteLight birds and full birds are middle managers, and just like all that group, some know what they are doing and some dont.
Generals just order their underlings to do what they do. I wager few generals have any idea how to fire a missle, fly a modern aircraft of any sort, etc.
jd
I am buying all of it. These are the moves necessary to become a dictator. Not one word about the WH being closed ALL this time, after all it is the Obama palace. He WILL impose marshal law on US citizens, because he has no plans to ever leave his home, the WH. And will use his military keeps things that way because they will be 'his' military. He has no fear of opposition. All ducks will be lined up and we are all watching it - now. First thing he did in first term, visit dictators.
ReplyDeletebtw, there's this: http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/10/obama-scores-dictator-trifecta/
If memory serves, Stalin purged "his" senior military for political reasons.
ReplyDeleteThat resulted in massive casualties and near defeat when the Nazis invaded.
I have no idea what's goin' on; but under this jackass, I'm willing to consider the possibility that mischief might be involved.
Possibility, not likelihood.
re the Judicial Watch Juice
ReplyDeleteit's dated October 18, 2013, but speaks of Hugo Chavez in the present tense??
I have nothing against Gen. Petraeus, but he was in the military 35 years before he saw combat. For what did he receive a chest full of medals...school ? My father and uncles got medals for combat.
ReplyDeleteDan Hynes
ReplyDeletethere have been no nukes at Dyess in well over a decade. Its shit like this that makes Alex Jones look like such a blazing fool and us along with him.
ReplyDeleteActually Rodger, the post was written on October 2, 2012 (but the site date is current) so Chavez was alive at the time of the article. :)
ReplyDeleteThe Ayatollah Obama should be removed for exactly the same reasons; Lack of trust and confidence in his leadership and judgement.
ReplyDeleteScottiebill
The admiral at STRATCOM and the general at 20th AF were in the nuclear chain of command. DOD has *always* been twitchy about any misbehavior around nukes.
ReplyDeleteI spent most of my AF career in SAC. Gambling and alcohol were reasonable reasons for relief back then.
There ain't no party
ReplyDeleteLike the dictator party
Cause the dictator party
Don't stop.
Sir H the Comet
He can fire every admiral and general
ReplyDeletein the military, and it will not make
a bit of difference.
It is the enlisted men who will make
the the difference. Why do you think
the libs have worked so hard to dis-
enfranchise the military? They know
that 80 percent of the military are
Republican.
In 1917, it was the Russian foot
soldiers who refused to fire on
citizens that led to the communist
revolution. If Obama orders "His"
military to shoot citizens, the
White House would be surrounded by
tanks!