Da
Meztgarino writes:
Anyone
who grew up missing a father because of WWII or death or imprisonment
or just going down to the corner for a pack of smokes and never coming
back is aware of this to some degree. I was fortunate to have a
very
experienced grandfather. He didn't play catch or help me build
things,
but he was a great and reliable source of wisdom.
My mother
married an affable drunk (as opposed to an alcoholic) who DID take me
hunting, and fishing, and all that stuff. He couldn't fix things,
but
he could find guys who could, and I watched 'em do it.
Still .
. . there's that persistent feeling of being different, minimalized,
the odd duck . . . especially if you're an only kid who has nobody with
whom to commiserate.
cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/woman-raised-lesbian-couple-i-ached-every-day-dad
Heather Barwick, who was raised by her mother and her mother's lesbian
partner, wrote in an essay this week that same-sex "marriage" is not
the same as normal marriage between a man and a woman, that the
traditional family is best, and that while growing up she "ached every
day for a dad."
Barwick, who is 31 now, married, and has four children, said that
"same-sex marriage and parenting withholds either a mother or father
from a child while telling him or her that it doesn't matter. That it's
all the same. But it's not."
"A lot of us, a lot of your kids, are hurting," wrote Barwick in her
essay for The Federalist website. "My father's absence created a huge
hole in me, and I ached every day for a dad. I loved my mom's partner,
but another mom could never have replaced the father I lost."
"I grew up surrounded by women who said they didn’t need or want a
man," said Barwick. "Yet, as a little girl, I so desperately wanted a
daddy. It is a strange and confusing thing to walk around with this
deep-down unquenchable ache for a father, for a man, in a community
that says that men are unnecessary."
[Full
TEXT]
Dr Sowell said it best with 'Much of the social history of the Western world over the past three decades has involved replacing what worked with what sounded good. In area after area - crime, education, housing, race relations - the situation has gotten worse after the bright new theories were put into operation. The amazing thing is that this history of failure and disaster has neither discouraged the social engineers nor discredited them.'
ReplyDeleteTim
Reading the comments at the link: It appears the author stirred up a hornet's nest of anger and angst directed at her. A few comment accused her of trying to destroy the Civil Rights movement by being against gay marriage..
ReplyDeleteI remember back 20+ years ago in college gays and lesbians were really against marriage, stating that is was part of the heterosexua-patriarch-slave-society.. blah blah blah blah.
I had one of my libbie art instructors (I was STEM.. but still had to take courses in liberal arts) once stated on my paper: "Marriage and the nuclear family is a disruption by capitalism to create greater consumption."
Now gays and lesbians all want to be married.
Why lose any sleep over the problems of sexual minorities and their infantile tantrums?
ReplyDeleteThey are maladjusted people who are deeply unhappy and will never achieve happiness because they don't even have a clue what will make them happy. Many of them do, however, get great satisfaction out of putting their angst on display and demanding that society at large change its values to accommodate them.
Phil N. LeBlanc
"the joys of the hetero condition"
ReplyDeleteExcellent way of stating the obvious!
olds-mo-william