scream-of-consciousness;
"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
Too bad Australia isn't a nuclear power. Nor is Japan. Nor
is South
Korea. That leaves it up to the US to nuke the NORKS. We have to
have
a combined attack using one or two tactical nukes, plus a considerable
amount of
firepower on non-nuclear military sites.
What will be the hard part won't be taking out the NORK nuclear and
other military capability. The hard part will be taking care of
the
starving masses who will want to head for China and S Korea.
That's
what will need the greatest planning ahead of the strike.
Stu & Skoonj
As
laughable as that NorK freak is, well
—
WWI began when some nut cake assassinated an Archduke and 17 million
died, and anther 20 million were casualties. When the machine gun was
the most lethal weapon.
It has been rumored that it would take about an hour for Japan to have some atomic bombs put together. Israel probably already has some ready to go, it is just a wonderment what they'd target first, Iran or Brussels.
Chris in NC, well, there's that. I suggest a couple of tactical nukes so that nothing is retrievable from the pile. Use, say, a bunker buster to take out a fortified nuclear research location, and you will still be able to dig out some of the dangerous nuclear components and maybe their engineers. With a nuke you don't have to worry about how much they can dig out, since it won't be anything. There are only a very few sites that need this treatment, and I take it for granted our intel knows where they are.
The NORKS also have considerable artillery, but again, I believe we know where they are.
Artillery killed more men than machine guns did in WW1.
ReplyDeleteLt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
Indeed ...
ReplyDeleteIt has been rumored that it would take about an hour for Japan to have some atomic bombs put together. Israel probably already has some ready to go, it is just a wonderment what they'd target first, Iran or Brussels.
ReplyDeleteNo need to nuke them. Based upon the results so far, the rocket will explode on takeoff and nuke them for us
ReplyDeleteIt's been said that the .380 automatic is the most powerful handgun in the world, because it only took one of those to start WW1.
ReplyDeleteSir H the Comet
Chris in NC, well, there's that. I suggest a couple of tactical nukes so that nothing is retrievable from the pile. Use, say, a bunker buster to take out a fortified nuclear research location, and you will still be able to dig out some of the dangerous nuclear components and maybe their engineers. With a nuke you don't have to worry about how much they can dig out, since it won't be anything. There are only a very few sites that need this treatment, and I take it for granted our intel knows where they are.
ReplyDeleteThe NORKS also have considerable artillery, but again, I believe we know where they are.
Feeding starving refugees will be the hard part.