Our
founding fathers knew what they were doing when they gave us the Second
Amendment to protect the people from the tyrants who throughout history
have been willing to kill thousands and millions of their people.
So yes, let's have an honest nationwide political discussion: we should
discuss why the gun crime rate is so much higher in Chicago than
Houston, even though Houston has much more lenient gun laws and many
gun shops. We should discuss why so many mass shootings occur in
gun-free zones, since that is what they are supposed to protect
against. We should honestly discuss black-on-black crime and
murders,
because that is the cause of most black deaths, not cops or
whites. We
should discuss why so many groups gin up hate on cops, since the
significant majority of them do their best to protect the public and
reduce crime.

Let's have an honest discussion about sanctuary cities. Isn't it
logical for people to believe they have the right to pick and choose
what laws to obey if politicians who took an oath to enforce the laws
pick and choose which ones they want to enforce? The majority of
the
public is against sanctuary cities, so why don't Democrats and
reporters who live and die by polls care about those polls?
We should also be honest about Colin Kaepernick. He kneeled as a
protest against cops and to discuss race. When he wore pigs on
his
socks, he was ginning up hate against cops. He, along with Obama,
wants to remake America. It was not about freedom of
speech. When
reporters, Democrats, other athletes, and Hollywood say it is about
unity and freedom of speech, they should be asked about the pigs on the
socks.
The protest by Colin wasn't popular, so we got the fantasy that it was
about freedom of speech. Then we got the media, politicians,
athletes,
and others pretending Trump turned it to race. Reporters and
others do
a lot of pretending about Trump. They were for Hillary, and they
hate
Trump, and almost all reporting reflects that.
[FULL]
My rights are not up for debate.
ReplyDeleteWhy pick on the 2nd amendment? If you repeal the right to assembly that would theoretically prevent mass shootings. One doesn't seem any more ridiculous than the other.
ReplyDeleteLuigi
Aww, c'mon guys. We don't want to BAN free speech, right to assemble, etc., we just want those things to be SAFE and CONTROLLED so no one will be offended or hurt.
ReplyDeleteGee. Just a little common sense regulation. To make things SAFER. For the children.
(Is this how our opposition on the left thinks?)
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/leading-trauma-surgeon-reveals-shocking-extent-of-london-s-gun-crime-a3651761.html
ReplyDelete