| Cruisin' Donk Twits Here Boss .. |
|||
|
|
Monday, January 18, 2010
Bush did it
6 comments:
-
Anonymous said...
-
Personally, I believe that a more robustly progressive set of public laws would have resulted in better economic conditions, and thus a better political environment for Democrats.
Yes, yes, that's it. You weren't Progressive enough! More Progressive Laws would have made the economy better! Please, be much more Progressive in your "public laws"! See how that works out for you, dipshit.
So, the backlash you're getting for enacting your Progressive agenda is only because you didn't go Progressive enough.
I swear, it's a mental illness among them. Whenever their policies don't work or more likely make things worse, it's always because they didn't go far enough.
AWM -
1/18/10, 8:18 PM
-
DougM said...
-
The Left has and will always claim that all failures of Leftism are the result of insufficient Leftism.
(What? Oh yeah)
... and so will Democrats. -
1/18/10, 9:12 PM
-
archie macdonald said...
-
My theory is that it's all about the candidates. Coakley is a poor candidate who was assumed would win because she's a democrat.
Brown will win, but next election, the donks will be back with a much better candidate and probably win.
That's not what I would like to see but it's what I expect to happen. -
1/18/10, 9:13 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Arch, conventionally I'd agree with you, but Brown is actually a smart politician, so maybe he survives the next outing. It all depends which cycle he ends up in. If he's up in 2012, I'll bet that he survives.
Casca -
1/18/10, 9:44 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
This is so far from over....
"Remember, it isn't who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes."
Daniel -
1/19/10, 5:34 AM
-
Anonymous said...
-
Daniel, not the exact words I was going to use, but the same sentiment.
mary -
1/19/10, 9:34 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)