Drudge has this titled "SHOCK PREDICTION," but if you're surprised, you haven't been paying attention, and still don't know. To answer your unasked question:
“
|
If the voters were ever to elect 50 Republicans and 50
Democrats to the U.S. Senate, the party of the Vice President would be
considered the majority party. The Vice President is named by the
Constitution to be the President of the Senate [the presiding officer].
The Vice President would cast the tie-breaking votes on all the
resolutions organizing the new Senate, including electing its officers
and assigning committee seats.
In 1881, the Senate stood at 37-37, with 2 Independents: one tended to
vote with the Democrats and the other with the Republicans. When Vice
President Chester Arthur became president after the assassination of
President Garfield, the Vice Presidency was left vacant, leaving no one
to cast a tie-breaking vote in the Senate. The two parties came to an
agreement where the Republicans controlled the committees and the
Democrats managed the patronage. |
” |
A better analogy, I think, is 1980. Reagan's sweep brought
with him a Republican Senate, but the House remained Democrat
controlled. Didn't matter. Houses Dems were so fearful of
Reagan's popularity that House Republicans were able to steamroll them -
for two years. I see the same thing happening in a split
Senate. Plus, if Reid manages to be one of those
50 Democrats, it will be an easy task to get him indicted, something
that's way-way overdue.
|