| “
|
CNN’s explanation of “why Obama
got more time speak” is an admission that Crowley intentionally gave
If authentic,
CNN’s memo explaining why Candy Crowley permitted President Obama
to speak four minutes more than Mitt Romney during Tuesday’s
presidential debate is devastating to that network:
Obama extra time because she thought he
hadn’t said enough. It’s also an admission that it doesn’t know
whether, objectively, Romney said more than Obama in the same amount of
time. CNN hadn’t done a word count when it made the claim, and Crowley
certainly hadn’t performed one when she gave Obama more time than
Romney.
Crowley was, however, watching the time, as she told
the candidates several times. As the CNN memo confirms, she wanted to
give Obama more time than Romney.
This is just one reason why Crowley should not be permitted to moderate
another high-stakes debate. Indeed, assuming the authenticity of the
CNN memo, no one from that outfit should be permitted to do so.
[Powerline Full]
Look, this was predictable, and in fact predicted. The nets are
in the tank for democrats, and all of them ought be excluded. Who
should moderate? Any high school debate teacher, picked at
random, would do a better job than any of that lot have done,
ever!
|
|
” |
Or just ask Toastmasters to provided a moderator.
ReplyDeleteTrusting newsies to run a debate is just stupid. They have never been unbiased. Never.
"Unbiased reporting" is a lie Hearst invented.
During the 19th Century they were more honest, and admitted it, often naming thewir paper after the party they support.
hook each candidates microphone to an electronic timer. At the end of their time it goes off and cannot be activated until it is again their time to speak. A visible to the candidate countdown clock with warning back ground would allow them to wind up their speech coherently.
ReplyDeleteNo suits; no ties; only sweats and a microphone. The moderator is a big Marine with the instructions to not let them kill each other and eye gouging is a disqualifying offense, at which time he's to physically remove the offender.
ReplyDeleteLet the debate begin.
-------------------------
ReplyDeleteJess - Your idea of a Marine moderator might actually work. The rules for a debate are simple. Give a gunny the rules, then let him enforce them.
IT would be worlds better than what the fourth estate/fifth column has provided.
Bullseye
-------------------------
Make it a requirement that Judge Judy moderate any more televised debates.
ReplyDeleteAll Excellent!
ReplyDeleteMake the candidates wear a shock collar. The buzzer buzzes and they keep talking or they interupt the other guy they get a jolt.
ReplyDeletewildbill
I think the next debate moderator should be this guy.
ReplyDeletewildbill beat me to it.
ReplyDeleteI like the microphones on a timer concept, MacWeave. And another thing: Why do we need moderators?
ReplyDeleteJust switch the mike feed from one candidate to the other on 2 minute intervals. Let them tell us what they think is important instead of some overfed lefty. If they want to use their time to detail a plan without being talked over, they can do that. If they feel it's better to get negative on the faults of the other guy, go for it.
Obviously the people who run these debates are dunces. Why should they have any say on what we get to hear? Let the candidates do that. It's fair, it's efficient, it's the American Way.
((Whoops, that last part explains why we have moderators.))