Obama, up close and personal

Did Barack Obama actually ... “ As seen in 1932 Up Close and Personal The question must be asked. I wish I didn’t have to be the one to ask it. But, since no one else will, it falls to me. Did Barack Obama actually, legitimately, fairly and legally win the election? My answer is an unequivocal no. Anymore I have to undergo therapy, mainline some heroin, and finish with a high  colonic—just to get out of bed.  The reason for that is, well, you know, because you have the same problem.  Something stinks terribly about the doings on Nov. 6.  I believe with every strand and fiber of my very being that our nation is now Mexico.  Or Venezuela,  Or any other banana republic with elections that are little more than an attempt to put the face of legitimacy on the current tyrant.  Joe Farah's list, partially shown below, contains, really, no single thing that others haven't already pointed out.  But to see it all lumped together is electric. Prior to the election, Democrats fought for open voting requiring no identification – particularly photo ID. Coincidentally, Obama won every state that didn’t fully require photo ID to vote. Democrats contended that voter ID laws suppress the vote. But they do not. They only suppress the illegal vote. Across Philadelphia, GOP poll inspectors were forcibly (and illegally) removed from polling locations. Coincidentally (or not), Obama received “astronomical” numbers in those very same regions, including locations where he received “over 99 percent” of the vote. Ward 4, which also had a poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Obama received 99.5 percent of the vote, defeating Romney 9,955 to 55. Obama also won 99.8 percent of the vote in 44 Cleveland districts. In another Ohio county, Obama won with 108 percent of the voters registered. Obama received 10 million fewer votes than he did in 2008. Romney received 3 million fewer votes than McCain. Obama won in the four critical swing states by a grand total of 500,000 votes. Some 5 million independents changed their votes from Obama to Romney in 2012. So Romney started the day 2.5 million votes ahead of where McCain was in 2008, as Jack Wheeler points out. This means that 5.5 million Republican voters are not accounted for. Either they didn’t show up at the polls or their votes were not counted. Does anyone believe there was less enthusiasm by Republicans about this election than for the one in 2008? [Full] In some weird fashion, understanding all this is reassuring.  Because it means that far from being a nation of looters and wild eyed socialists, we are good people sold out by a corrupt media and a well planned and funded  group of thugs, punks, and one worlders. However, we are a nation of people who value iur freedom, and have no problem using the  force of arms to protect it.  I have to believe that we are near an ignition point.  It cannot come too soon. Also read American Thinker article. ”