Tuesday, November 05, 2013

Now Hitler is Pissed at Obama

Hitler Loses Health Insurance





 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USG_gjaEYak

comments

What ru keep in croset

Oh My




Laughing Wolf's Fish Fry




PSA

"See You There" -Joey Heatherton and Sarah Palin

CLICK
UPDATE - Whether you come to the fish fry and meet Cameron Diaz or not, C. Blake Powers has a GIFT for YOU!

Is it time ... YET?






Previously (October 18)


Last Week Maj. Gen. Michael Carey was 
personally removed by Obama “due to a loss of trust and confidence in his leadership and judgment.” Gen. Carey is by my count the 6th Flag Officer removed by Obama in the past few years; three of them had personal knowledge of the Benghazi affair.   Carey was in charge of the units responsible for its 450 nuclear missiles.  What's going on?  And don't say nothing.  

Is there a real life Seven Days in May scenario brewing?  It sure as hell wouldn't surprise  me.  Here are some comments that resonated with me. Note that all of them cited are from the Brit press. 

Today

ANN ARBOR, MI – U.S. Army Lieutenant General (Ret.) William "Jerry" Boykin, in a recent World Net Daily radio interview, confirmed that people with high security clearances connected to the Muslim Brotherhood hold important positions in every major federal agency including the Pentagon and the Department of Defense.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a radical Islamist organization that has vowed the destruction of America from within.

Click here to hear radio clip.

General Boykin has the credentials to back up his conclusions.  He was one of the original members of the U.S. Army's Delta Force which he ultimately led in combat operations.  He also served a tour in the CIA during which time he participated in clandestine operations throughout the world.   He served his last four years in the Army as Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.



Obama Admin: USA Is An “Islamic Country”


While I'm at Mr. Consertive



Nipped

Russia




Blowing Up the Constitution?

Ho Hum. Once again, through sheer ineptitude or by grand design, Liberals have introduced plague, and now prescribe a cure.


I started reading "A How-To Guide ..." and quickly grew a chip on my shoulder because 1) the title itself; and 2) stuff like this.


"Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was pilloried when she told Egyptian revolutionaries last year that she "would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012." But her sentiment is taken for granted by anyone who has actually tried to write a constitution since politicians stopped wearing powdered wigs. 

I don't like RBG. She is a Justice only because her husband lobbied Clinton more strenuously than did others under consideration.  "Lobbying Clinton"  is accepted code for cash money gifts; seven-figures was rumored at the time.  She's ex-ACLU, and acts like it.  The only modicum of respect she gets from me, besides her office,  is because Justice Scalia likes her.  Okay.  I'm wired. Wrote my headline, and began picking through Alex Seitz-Wald's piece for more incendiary statements.  Like these quotes from the Thomas Jefferson to James Madison correspondence.

But with respect to future debts, would it not be wise and just for that nation to declare, in the constitution they are forming, that neither the legislature, nor the nation itself, can validly contract more debt than they may pay within their own age, or within the term of 19. years? And that all future contracts will be deemed void as to what shall remain unpaid at the end of 19. years from their date? This would put the lenders, and the borrowers also, on their guard." 

And THIS!

On similar ground it may be proved that no society can make a perpetual constitution, or even a perpetual law. The earth belongs always to the living generation.[...] Every constitution then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of 19 years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right.--It may be said that the succeeding generation exercising in fact the power of repeal, this leaves them as free as if the constitution or law has been expressly limited to 19 years only."

Oh, now they like Jefferson.  How nice.

Wait.  WTF am I doing? Arguing against the idea of hard-wired fiscal policies?  Arguing against sunset lawson every piece of legislation?  Am I nuts?  No.  I was acting like a knee-jerk Democratwho sees a  Rush Limbaugh, or  a Fox News attribution,  and swings into full chimp mode.  I saw  "Blow up the Constitution andMFCS!

You may disagree, but I think Alex Seitz-Wald is on the right track  Towards the end, inevitably,  rewriting the Constitution is addressed.  I am here filled with he same dread as you.  In a country so politically corrupt
where Democrats achieved super majorities in both Houses through election fraud, who can you trust? 

" When the original constitutional convention convened in May 1787, members were tasked, simply, with proposing amendments to the Articles of Confederation. But once they got going, they realized that the Articles were so flawed and they wanted to change so much that they would need to start from scratch.

What a convention might look like is for the public to decide. It might, as Levinson proposes, be populated by citizens selected by lottery and given two years and plenty of staff and resources to come up with something."

I cannot buy into it.  If I feel that the United States can never again win any war if post-Nixon Democrats have any meaningful voice in its conduct, and I most assuredly do, then no way I want them rewriting the constitution.  But Wait!  Here again, it is Thomas Jefferson who solves the problem—in his 1787 letter to William Smith.  .

" God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty.
 We have had 13. states independent 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms."

I have suggested that it was time for both sides to meet in the desert.  No quarter given.  Brilliant.  The losers won't be around to suffer the horrors of balanced budgets, honest elections, secure borders and subdued Judiciary branch. Peace in our Time! Click-click.