University has decided student groups on campus cannot
determine their own leadership. Consequently, a muslim can run the
Christian group, a global warming skeptic can run the Earth First
group, a Republican can run the College Democrats, etc. You get the
The rule came in part because, as you will not be surprised to learn, a
Christian fraternity “had expelled several students for violating their
behavior policy. One student said he was ousted
will be made to care. You’ll be made to care about gay marriage. You’ll
be made to care about killing kids. You’ll be made to care about the
influence of a secular culture on your children as they grow. You’ll be
made to care about a host of issues.
because he is gay.” Tish Harrison Warren wrote about this at
Christianity Today. Her Christian group allowed anyone to be a member,
“but it asks key student leaders—the executive council and small group
leaders—to affirm its doctrinal statement, which outlines broad
Christian orthodoxy and does not mention sexual conduct specifically.
But the university saw belief statements themselves as suspect.”
The first bit of Tish Harrison Warren’s column is really the most
relevant part for my purposes here.
I thought I was an acceptable kind of
evangelical. I’m not a
fundamentalist. My friends and I enjoy art, alcohol, and cultural
engagement. We avoid spiritual clichés and buzzwords. We value
authenticity, study, racial reconciliation, and social and
lot of Christians have long thought they could sit on the sidelines.
Only the icky evangelicals they don’t much care for and the creepily
committed Catholics would have to deal with these issues and the people
who hate those deeply committed to their faith. They, on the other
hand, could sit on the sidelines, roll their eyes, and tell everyone
that they didn’t think it was that big a deal. They were, after all, on
birth control or watching whatever trendy HBO series is on or having a
cocktail or perfectly willing to bake a cake for a gay wedding.
Nonetheless, the secularists at Vanderbilt kicked her Christian group
off campus “for being the wrong kind of Christians.”
My friend Matthew Lee Anderson has some thoughts on it. In part he
writes, “if we do not grasp the joy of the martyrs, we do not
understand them at all.” I tweeted out Matt’s post yesterday, but was
reminded of it again today by my friend Nick. He sent me Rod Dreher’s
piece on the whole thing.
Folks, this is precisely why I started the saying “You will be made to
care.” It all stemmed from a diarist here at RedState who took the
position that gay marriage did not affect him, he did not care about
it, and he would never care about. But, of course, you will be made to
care. It is a larger issue than just gay marriage and many comfortably
naive, living at the margins of faith, Christians, think they have a
comfortable path through life in the United States.
Put bluntly: if you do have a comfortable path through life with no
fears at all of persecution, you probably are not a Christian. Islam
may be about submission, but Christianity is about suffering.1 The
suffering may not be major. It may be an accumulation of small sleights
over time. It may be the loss of a friend or just the expulsion of your
Christian group from your private school. But Christianity is a
religion of suffering and persecution.
You may think you can sit on the sidelines. You may think you can
opt-out of the culture war. You may think you can hide behind your
trendy naked Leena Dunham t-shirt while you sip trendy drinks talking
about trendy shows and writing columns demanding Christians be forced
by the state to bake cakes, provide flowers and farms, and offer up
photographs of gay weddings. But not only will you one day be called to
account to your God for how you advanced his kingdom, but on this Earth
you will be made to care. That does not mean you have license to be
bitter or angry or hateful. You should love others and help others.
Just do not expect anything in return. [Full
blog is, and has been for 12 years, about whatever I'm into at the
moment. Politics mostly. I've eschewed discussing religion
ponder things like, "who do atheist turn to ... " sort of thing.
I have been made to look deeper into the state or our culture, and the
reasons why ... why all of it? I won't evangelize, but it has
impossible for me to ignore. Metzger summarized nicely with
not a practicing Christian, but ... as a strong believer in custom and
tradition and ritual as the glue that keeps a culture intact .."
With the loss of those guardrails came this, today. Ten million words will not
beging to summraize. But, you know; you feel. War is
declared against the Judeo-Christain ethic. Monsters have been
Last week the ubiquitous "Anonymous"
challenged a Tailgunner Dick comment with, "But
if you want to prove Mr. Dawkins is wrong it's necessary to prove that
God does exist (which no-one has managed to do to date).
I responded, but quicky deleted; it was the
stuff of a range war. On reflection though, my answer is thatI am proventhat God exists. My
suggestion to Anonymous would be to read ( to make it easier) Saint
Thomas Aquinas's Shorter
Summa (or the even the more concisepony),
and we can take it from there. But it's a sterile challenge, for
same reason it's impossible to discuss, say, the 984 outrages against
our rule of law perpetrated by this Liberal/Obama government:
Obamunists have their own media, their own history, their own wise men,
and most importantly, their own statist religion and pope.
By the by, if Anonymous, or anyone else, would like to know why I
God exists, I will be happy to answer via e-mail, for
I am of average intellect, and no match for the godless philosophers
that Dawkin's camp will utilize,like, say, Friedrich Nietzsche.