|
My brain's been pestering me to
do the remarkable comparison between Hillary Clinton's Peter Paul case,
and Robert
"The Torch" Torricelli's David Chang caper. This morning I gave in to
brain and started collecting data. Whoa. It seems my brain's been down
that road
before. Like 5 years ago.
|
 |
|
Holy crap. This thing has
been in the works that long? Since I started, allow me to
continue. There are updates. BTW, I believe this sword
hanging over Hillary's head is one of the reasons Democrats invented
Barrack Obama.
Let's compare.
|
|
The Torch
Korean-American
businessman David Chang was already serving a federal prison sentence
for making illegal campaign contributions to Torricelli’s 1996
campaign.
|
Sen.
Robert Torricelli, despite being accused of accepting money from
a man already convicted of giving him that money, blithely ran
for re-election. Finally, but only after polls showed
the Torch would lose to the Republican challenger Doug Forrester, did the
democrat party "convince" him to bow out. The Torch was never
prosecuted.
|
Her Filthiness
Hollywood
mogul Peter Paul has multiple convictions for everything from drugs to
securities fraud. Like every other well heeled crook at the time,
he was trying for a Clinton pardon. His method of payment:
funneling illegal campaign contributions to Hillary. He ran a
fundraiser,nominally to thank Bill for his great presidency, but in reality for Hilly.
Two days after the gala, the Washington Post publicized Paul's criminal record, and Hillary Clinton denied knowing Paul and "vowed not to take any contributions from him".
Through her official spokesman, Howard Wolfson, Hillary stated on
August 16, 2000 that she would return $2,000 she reported receiving
from Paul in June 2000, and would not have anything further to do with him. [Wikipedia]
|
It
wasn't $2000. It was $700,000, and she didn't return, or report
it. Clinton’s National Finance
Director David Rosen was indicted over it. Hillary claimed she
was not involved in the fund raiser, and knew nothing about it.
Knowingly soliciting a contribution of $25,000 or more is a felony
punishable by up to five years in prison. In a lawsuit against Hillary,
Paul produced a smoking-gun videotape showing Hillary Clinton
expressing enthusiasm about the event and telling Paul to contact her
aide any time to further plan details. Incredibly, the California courts
are so far not allowing that videotape to be used in court, as part of a lawsuit filed by Paul. The
national media have ignored the case, so there has been no public
outrage. What a surprise
|
|
| “ | Notwithstanding more than six years of consistent
allegations made by Hillary’s largest donor that Hillary broke campaign
laws and then obstructed all investigations into her illegalities -
causing the unnecessary indictment and trial of her campaign
functionary, David Rosen for supposedly hiding information from Hillary
that she in fact had full knowledge of- Hillary has never been
accountable.
| ” |
|
Incredible. David
Rosen, just as Webb Hubbel had earlier, was willing to take prison, and
loss of his good name and career, to save a Clinton. Webb was
repaid with Riady cash; we don't know yet what Rosen received,
(He is still breathing,however).
|
Paul has a website, peterfpaul.com/
I assume the video we have below is the same video that is not working
on his site. Lots of good info there however.
|
|
Can't get this to play on Firefox or IE. Think it's been sabotaged???
ReplyDeleteIt's non-operative until it's released to the public. Evidently there's something blocking it now, like a court order? If anyone gets a working copy, please, I want it.
ReplyDeleteFucking UTube Commies, won't load.
ReplyDeleteIT'S NOT YOU-TUBE. PAUL HAS IT EMBARGOED.
ReplyDeleteImagine if HRC had to withdraw. Barack and Edwards. Oh My God, it would be the best.
ReplyDeleteUnless Gore got in. A true 3 ringer. Non stop hilarity. Thompson/Steele would be a lip lock.
MM
In Ninth Circus Territory, they'll call it a "No controlling authority" kinda deal. After all campaign finance law is "an evolving paradim" like no harm no foul man.
ReplyDeleteThere is, however, plenty of video info while we await this particular one, over here:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.hillcap.org/
Your Majesty, YHM that should please you.
ReplyDeleteWhat?
ReplyDeleteYou mean to you need to SEE a video to know that the Hildabeast is a felon?
Who's the little 'happie' off camera doing the commenting?..Is that coming from underneath Peter Paul's desk?
ReplyDeleteSept. 7, 2007 - Calif. Appellate Court will hear arguments whether Hillary is to be brought into the Paul v Clinton case as a defendant. If not, trial goes forward against Bill and discovery can begin. She will finally be under oath. In her deposition, Paul has 5 hours of home video to show. She is not going to be able to get away this time with "I don't recall." This woman is the most evil, dangerous, cold-blooded, and manipulative politician this great republic has even encountered. Other than that, luv ya, Hill.
ReplyDelete...Doug from Upland
New whistleblower site: http://www.ejfa.org
Since the mainstream media refuses to report on the court case or her four false FEC reports, we are hoping that an army of bloggers can do the job of Truth Boating Hillary. Thanks for your help.