|
Hillary to State, and Holder to
Justice. I wonder how many voters who decided against "Four
more years of Bush," as the Obama campaign mantra went, will react to "Clinton II, But Even More"? You know about Her Filthiness,
but what about Holder? For starters, he was brought into
Team Clinton at the urging of his good friend, Ron Brown. In this
instance, as in most, we can judge Holder by his friend. Here are my top 25 articles on Holder, from his years with Bill and Hill. In case you want to know. Hell, I can't take them with me.
|
|
Doesn't Obama have any of his own friends? Hasn't he cultivated the usual life long associations that other presidents have called on when they took office? Why is he retreading all of these old Clinton people?
ReplyDeleteJust who has their hand up this puppet's pooper?
MM
Eric Holder?? How can it get worse-Jamie Gorelick for CIA? Sandy Berger at NSA or FBI? Hillary for Ginsberg? Sadly entirely possible-I hope all you effers that sat this one out are happy now
I had forgotten just how slippery that administration was. Glad to have them back.
ReplyDelete"Doesn't Obama have any of his own friends?"
ReplyDeleteYeah, but most of them would never pass an FBI background check.
shit...and this is the truth...obama would never pass and FBI background check. ever.
ReplyDeleteThe sunbitch wasn't elected. He was imposed.
ReplyDeleteGary Aldrich already settled the FBI redundancy in background checks for White House employees. Now you'll see more "community organizers" with names starting with "al-" in there than you could shake a kebab at.
ReplyDeleteI would have much preferred Algonquin J. Calhoun.
ReplyDeleteLet's not go peacefully when they come for us and our guns
ReplyDeletehttp://shock.military.com/Shock/videos.do?displayContent=177117&page=5
Hey anon,
ReplyDeleteThat is truly a scary video. You have to wonder just what the hell were they they thinking in England and Australia? They are foretellers of the left here. That is exactly what they want to do to us, exactly. Those men saying unity, unity are dead on.
The left uses our schools and the left dominated MSM to get this undercurrent constantly flowing-GUNS BAD GUNS BAD-so that when the next inevitable mass shooting occurs, the resistance is already on the wane.
Here's how insidious this propaganda is. A female friend was telling me how she loves to take long hikes into fairly remote areas here in Colorado. She said she had gotten herself up to some lakes in Indian Peaks and looked around and felt pretty creepy, seeing as how she was very, very alone. So I said, "Well you're armed right?" and she says it's illegal to carry a firearm in National Forest. I'm like, fucking bill me. Don't shoot the weapon off but if a mountain lion or a sex predator gets up on you, what? a stick? And she hummed and hawed, knew I was right but it's this constant drumbeat the left spews that plants these seeds in people's heads.
Not one weapon I own is registered-not that it matters I guess, I will never surrender them, but what? A SWAT team would make mince meat of me.
MM
MM:
ReplyDeleteIt is entirely legal to carry a firearm on National Forest lands. The National Parks are a different matter ... not that legality has stopped me from exercising basic human rights in the past.
Kristopher
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure where Indian Peaks is, BLM? National Forest? I don't know, but I'm with you, I always carry a weapon when I'm back country.
MM
You can carry and shoot on BLM land as well. Just stay 100 yards from campsites or structures on BLM or Forest Service lands.
ReplyDeleteShe's been lied to or is making stuff up.
That is, 100 yards away while shooting. As for carrying, simply obey state laws and the feds can't touch you.
ReplyDelete