Note from a terrorist

The Liberal's Terrorist

Obamunist reaction to citizens working to stop the socialization of the United States has been  to call  them (us) domestic terrorists.  To the extent that Sam Adams and pals terrorized British loyalists, they're right.  Good on us.  The concept of leaving the threat of force on the the table is salutary. Liberalism  doesn't recognize it, but it's true, and an appropriate tool when properly used.  Today, 75% of Americans adamantly oppose having Obamacare forced on us.  So far, the Democrat response has been, "we don't care what you want."  To that end,  they've lied, bullied, and now threaten to impose it by the sneak attack called reconciliation.  That's just item #53 on a long, long list. Whose country is this?  We may find out soon enough. Here's the thing.  Any number of assholes, from Charles Manson, to white, black and brown separatists, supremacists, sophists and anarchists  have tried to foment bloody revolution in this country.  They, all of them, failed because said movements were transparently hate-based, a non-starter in the U.S.  Spontaneous combustion, and that's necessary for the purpose, requires that a very large number of good people see a clear and present threat to their freedom.  Nothing less will support a flame. This current government is more radical than could have been imagined by, say Hubert Humphrey, when he  broached the possibility.  But, here we are. Wrong doers ought to be fearful of the consequences, what's wrong with that?  Nothing.  If you don't hit a trip-wire, there's nothing to worry about.  So be good, and  stay clear.  IMHO.  And hell, Liberals are fond of instructing us, usually when siding with our nation's enemies, what a "terrorist" is."  There you go.