|
| “
|
These
fears are mostly overblown. Some of the alarmist scenarios are the
opposite of what would more likely unfold after an Israeli attack.
Although dangerous for Israel, a preventive strike remains the most
effective answer to the possibility of Khamenei and the Revolutionary
Guards having nuclear weapons. Provided the Israeli air force is
capable of executing it, and assuming no U.S. military action, an
Israeli bombardment remains the only conceivable means of derailing or
seriously delaying Iran’s nuclear program and—equally
important—traumatizing Tehran.
|
” |
|
|
My answer is, and Syria, Afhanistan, and Pakistan to boot!
|
|
ZERO chance the new Israel has the grit or the political unity to take a bite out of the big shit sandwich. Imagine if it fails, don't look to the US for help. We are an occupied people now.
ReplyDeleteOn top of that, the execution piece is problematic.
ReplyDeleteCasca
Maybe they could bomb DC at the same time?
ReplyDelete(not puttin'my name on this one)
"Maybe they could bomb DC at the same time?"
ReplyDeleteJust think of how great America could be once again if the great satan were removed.
The ideal would be if iran struck first then Israel would have reason and backing to pave all of that beautiful real estate around them.
ReplyDeleteOr wait till mecca has pilgrimage day and get about 1 million at once with even a conventional weapon.
I am an islamophobe and my name is george
What, you getting soft in your ancient age, Rodg? Since when have you shown such love to the Yemenis?
ReplyDeleteNuke'm all 'til their oil glows.
ReplyDelete