|
Milbank's
Fault. Drives. Me. Nuts.
| “
|
Milbank
offers the final justification for his assertion by saying “in Glenn
Back’s case, I’ve documented a few cases in which it’s led a crazy
person to snap.” Therefore Milbank believes even though rhetoric of the
right might not be responsible in this case, attacking Beck and Palin
now is a legitimate form of “rough justice” for their past sins.
Milbank’s argument follows the tortured logic of Media Matters founder
David Brock who claimed Beck was responsible for three thwarted
assassination attempts either because a psychopath claimed Beck as an
influence or some tangential evidence existed to suggest an unstable
lunatic may have watched Beck at some point in their life. [Full
article and video] |
” |
|
Nice phrase, "in the aggregate".
ReplyDeleteResponsibility is taken in the aggregate the same way science is done by consensus.
So they attempt to hand others the "responsibility" for something in a way that deprives them of the means to do anything about it. Nice tactic.
[something they could not possibly have had anything to do with nor could not possibly have changed or 'fixed' - but that's not important, now]
e~C
Lemmee see if I get this straight... if I finally reach the point where I go nuclear and start "offing" MFCSSOB leftist-socialists of un-named political affiliation (Nudge! Nudge! Wink! Wink!,) I could get scott-clean off just by saying that I used to watch Glen Beck?
ReplyDeleteWould I have to pay him a user fee or royalties or something?
Sounds like a good reason to shut down MSNBC first. Every time I go past that channel they are spitting and fuming with more hate and vitriol than FoxNews...
ReplyDeleteSo if I go nuts can I blame the leftards?
ReplyDeletethoR~
III