
I see a direct link from the explosion of junk science that plagues
us, and Obama's birth
certificate question. For instance.
Penn State professor Michael Mann is
positively shown to have manipulated data to promote a rapid, recent
rise in the Earth's temperature [See Climategate], attributable to my
use of hairspray. Much of his scam is believed to have been
prepared while employed by the University of Virgina however.
Requests for access to his UVA papers had been refused by the
University, until newly elected not-a-democrat Virginia A/G Ken Cuccinelli took UVA to court - and won!
So, finally, we get to see what Al Gore's brain trust was up to in the
erstwhile era. Who could complain about a little sunshine?
That's right.
Va. Democrats look to
stop climate change probe
Hard
left liberals, which today include every democrat in congress, have
always fought tooth and nail to prevent sunlight from creeping
in. And, even when the sun prevails, to the point of burning
their collective asses, they will still continue the stonewall.
To this very day some refuse to believe Alger Hiss was a
commie MoFo. Refuse to believe the Rosenbergs were
guilty. Refuse to this day, despite overwhelming evidence. that
claims about man cause climate change were manufactured, congressional
democrats are still trying to pass climate change legislation.
Even though the Obama administration has proffered not a single piece
of authenticated evidence of his U.S. birthright, people who
question it are (in the Soviet style, I might add) deemed crack-pots.
They don't care about Obama. They care about how they will look
if the truth outs. The truth has worn off of everything
boss. Everything. History is rewritten. Transcripts
are altered. News goes unreported. If you and me are
schooled in two versions of history, guess what happens? No,
don't guess. It's happened.
But Rodge, what can we do about it?
The first step is to understand the enemy. Evan Sayet is a great
primer.
The next step is to use a
flamethrower on them.
|
|
For this kind of thing,
ReplyDeleteI award the "Trofie."
[Jack Benny] Well! [\Jack Benny]
ReplyDeleteBravo ! : )
ReplyDeleteThe scientific method is now computer projection. I would like to see one of those well funded CSMFBBBBs feed their data into their models and predict the last 10 or 20 years.
ReplyDeleteCosmology and evolution are interesting theories but there are no experiments that can prove or disprove them. Relativity was based on prior unexplained experiments and Einstein was able to make predictions as to how light would behavior in a gravitational field which were then verified during the next solar eclipse. In the days of CRTs, you would never be able to get a focused image without adjusting for electrons traveling near light speeds.
What verifiable predictions have the AGW folks made?
Laurence
Very useful, Rodge.
ReplyDeleteA friend gave me an adage which I found both useful and puzzling for some years: If you want to know what a Lefty is doing, listen to what he accuses normal people of doing.
Evan provides the psychological foundation for this at 19:20 minutes. I'm grateful.
Great explanation.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I'm a simple person who likes simple explanations. I'm going to go with one or more of "retarded, insane, stupid, evil"
It's hard to decide which.