|
| “
|
Axelrod
also has his eye on the Colorado example, where ... Bennet lost
blue-collar white women by double digits and
blue-collar white men by more than 2-to-1. Yet he prevailed by amassing
strong support from young people, Hispanics, and other
minorities." So
.. what they're saying is, they're gonna have to go
out and get more minorities, blacks, and women.
How are they gonna do it? Well, by virtue of the details in this
piece, they're gonna have to go out and basically promise
communism.
... they've decided the only way they're gonna win reelection is by
getting
more minorities to vote, more young people to vote. ...
They're gonna have to be bluntly open and honest. I mean,
if you think class warfare rhetoric's bad, it's gonna get worse
now. ... If this stuff all holds true .... it sounds
to me like this is
a recipe for a landslide defeat, folks. [Rush Limbaugh
commenting on "White Flight." - Full
transcript]
|
” |
|
Wellll, the problem for the Dims is while they got a majority of minorities in the mid-terms it looks like that majority was smaller than expected. The difference may have been small say about 5% but that was out of expected black voters. It seems the various blocks that were in or on the verge of becomming middle class have been berry, berry, disapointed in the last two years.
ReplyDeleteMarried women with kids of all races are not happy.
Which is exactly why they desperately want a "path to citizenship" for illegals...
ReplyDeleteThis is no different than any other effort by Communists/Marxists to change a society. Divide the people, use social justice as the carrot for change and do all of the above in the most devious and evil way possible. Promises hinge on making those that have give to those that don't. In the end the fomenters of the efforts live in luxury while the peons suffer the consequences.
ReplyDelete