|
| “
|
The Cause 
The Effect
|
Warren Court & Liberal Successors
|
Two years ago, fugitive murder suspect Jesse
Dimmick kidnapped newlyweds Jared and Lindsay Rowley after bursting
into their home on a Saturday morning.
Now, he’s suing them for $235,000.
Dimmick contends in the
breach of contract suit that after he entered the couple’s home in
September 2009, they reached a legally binding, oral contract that they
would hide him for an unspecified amount of money.
“Later, the Rowleys reneged on said oral contract, resulting in my
being shot in the back by authorities,” Dimmick wrote in a notarized
legal document, which said he was filing the counterclaim in response
to a suit the Rowleys filed against him in September. [Full]
|
” |
|
Any contract entered into under duress is null and void. If any judge allows this suit to go forward he should be taken out and strung up by the neck.
ReplyDeleteLet me know where He's at . Stand that sumbitch by the window for a few minutes . I got a Bean Field Rifle that will fix this prollem . ; ) >
ReplyDeleteLiberals are why scuzzball Dimmick wasn't swinging from a gibbet about a year ago. That would moot the suit issue altogether.
ReplyDeleteLt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
A contract requiring an illegal is void on its face.
ReplyDeleteDo I have permission to use Dimmick's lawyer instead of the silhouette targets I normally use for practice?
ReplyDeleteYeah, I know it's a bit more aggressive than my long-stated solution to the lawyer overpopulation problem: Upon passing the bar exam, the applicant will be neutered before being released back into society, but special cases deserve special measures. - Skyhawker, Doug