|
| “
|
[...] Second, Conservatives, fresh off the birth
of a movement they identify with, and armed with a convincing 2010
Mid-Term Election “shellacking” of their Progressive and Democrat
opponents, have finally come to understand that if Republicans run
Conservative candidates those candidates can – and will – win. But it’s
the task of getting those candidates to ballot that is proving to be
the trick.
Along with the realization that Conservatives can win in a
Conservative-leaning country, comes the ugly truth that the
“establishment” Republican apparatus is – just like the Chicago
politician – more concerned with maintaining power and “selecting”
candidates than doing the hard work of administering to a bottom-up
organization – such as the Republican Party was chartered to be.
Today’s Republican establishment is, for all
practical purposes, a mirror (or converse) image of the Democrat Party;
an organization structured from the top-down. [Brietbart
Full]
There
is nothing I could, or want to add. Wait. A-Freaking-Men!
|
|
” |
|
Salvato sure sounds like a blowhard to me. You know, those people who don't really understand a subject, but forcefully expound an opinion they see as pure common sense.
ReplyDeleteThe vast majority of delegates at party conventions are party hacks who know how to sell their votes. A brokered convention will produce Romney as the candidate... unless Santorum was smart, which he ain't.
Casca
No, he aint. And so what is the goal, really? A brokered convention would be a disaster. All of this and you'd come out with some no name candidate? Or Palin? Is that what everyone keeps bringing it up, hoping for? What a nightmare that would be.
ReplyDeleteI like my candidates vetted and caucused appropriately. If anyone else wanted to be President, they should have ran like everyone else.
When did an Open Convention become a sneer-worthy Brokered Convention? The reason to oppose the brokers, the men - always only men, historically - in the smoke-filled rooms is now the routine, with the pros managing (controlling) every aspect of the nominating process. I like the candidates being vetted, too, but by me, not be them.
ReplyDelete