Thug Culture
Womens'
Lawsuit Aims to End Forced Unionization
|
[...]
A little publicized federal court case being heard on [Today] in US
District Court in Minneapolis, however, takes the divisive issue away
from state lawmakers and propels it to the national level, with the
potential to end or embolden what some call compulsory unionization
once and for all.
“We wish we didn’t have to be in this position to begin with but since
we were put in this position, we do believe that this violates our
first amendment rights and we intend to argue that in court,” said
Jennifer Parrish, a Rochester provider who’s named in the complaint.
A dozen licensed family home child care providers have challenged the
constitutionality of child care unionization. Specifically, the
Minnesota small business owners ... [Full]
| I
feel like were engaged in a
Battle of Midway. If so— USA! UAS! USA! |
|
” |
|
Look for this one to go all the way to the Supreme Court.
ReplyDeleteWife and I have been operating a childcare from our home for 17 years here in MN. So we are both "management" and "labor." Who would we picket, ourselves? This was about linging the unions pockets, pure and simple. However the only way the would be able to forcefully collect dues would be to withhold money from our payments they make on behalf of county assisted families.
ReplyDeleteWe have never refused to take in a family because they receive financial assistance. As an evil capitalist, why would I? The check is always on time and it never bounces. I would refuse to take them if it meant the SEIU and their ilk would be getting their grubby hands on my money.