“
|
Among the claims made by the ad is that the Obamas throw lavish parties
at the White House for “socialist friends” that include flying in
$100-per-pound Kobe beef from Japan; the President’s $800 billion
stimulus did not produce any net jobs, and that “this deep recession
was not caused by the Bush tax cuts, Republican lax regulation, or Wall
Street greed.”
Instead, it said the nation’s financial troubles were caused by the
subprime mortgage collapse that it says was created by Democrats. It
blamed presidents Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama, along
with Janet Reno, Franklin Raines, Chris Dodd, and Barney Frank.
Obama campaign staff and other Democratic leaders in Ohio said the ad
was an attempt to trick voters. [full]
I
ask myself, "Would John McCain have run this ad?" I mean, it's
absolutely dead-on. No, he most certainly would not have.
Mitt Romney then is not John McCain. Thanks be to God.
Aside from taking back the White House from the insurgency, Mitt
could actually be a good president (meaning better than the past
four).
|
|
” |
Better than the last four? Almost ANYONE would be! Like standing next to someone with poorly shined boots during a personnel inspection, Romney cant help but look great by comparison.
ReplyDeleteTim
Mitt Romney then is not John McCain.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to frame this.
And please, no more crippled war heroes, congenial statesmen, or zany libertarians for GOP presidential candidates. Let's just win with the smart, aggressive, salesman types.
Those filthy Republicans. How dare they use the truth against Obama. It's just not fair.
ReplyDeleteGrinfilledCelt
And how dare Romney not be as incompetent a campaigner as McCain?
ReplyDeletehttp://ecnpac.org/videos.html
ReplyDeleteTruth to a liberal is like Holy Water to a vampire.
ReplyDelete