Some
years ago I carried on about the inkjet (and laser) printer
cartridge
scam. Since then I bought my current printer, a Canon IP 2700,
because
it was cheaper than buying refill cartridges for my HP. I do
very little printing anymore so the ink ought go a long way. It does
not. That
suggests that Canon may be one of the manufacturers who have a "date expiration" chip.
Anyway, these failed reset
it.
Because
the industry operates on a classic razor-and-blades business model—the
printer itself isn't pricy, but ink and toner refills cost an
exorbitant amount—printer manufacturers have a huge incentive to get
you to replace your cartridges quickly.
One way they do so is through technology: Rather than printing
ever-fainter pages, many brands of printers are outfitted with sensors
or software that try to predict when they'll run out of ink. Often,
though, the printer's guess is off; all over the Web, people report
that their printers die (38%) before their time.
I tried refilling my own cartridges, but with
horrid
result. For awhile I beat the system by buying refills from a
third
party ink refiller, but the last two times the cartridges ($30 for
black and color - against $68 for small
Canon) were crap. I discovered by reading
this
that printer companies have put the most successful of these companies
out of business for violating copyright law (by reading and reverse
engineering their cartridge detectors). Sounds like a Eric Holder
thing, wot? Those left operating, I guess, pose no competitive
problem.
Around 2008 Kodak introduced, and vigorously advertised, a new
Ink Jet
printer line. Part of the spiel were low ink cartridge
replacement
cost, and longer lasting too. This was possible because it's
estimated
that up to 38% of ink is left when the "programmed" printer
shuts
them down. Kodak didn't do that. Then. Now, I'd buy one in
a
heartbeat, but evidently Kodak, too, have joined the
scamming, as
witnessed by Kodak
fixes I found.
I always had good success with HP cheap printers, and there are tons of
documentation about beating HP cartridge monitors, so that's the way
I'll probably go. It all just pisses me off though. But still not
half
as bad as Verizon do, who think it's my full time job to figure out how
to get around their latest additions to an already f'kd up cable menu
system,
and table set box and router apparatus exchanges. Grrrr.
Don't get me
started.
|
90% of what I print could be done on a tractor feed dot matrix
ReplyDeleteFor my old HP, replacng both cartridges costs almost as much as the printer cost, but I don't want the hassle of installing and updating the drivers for a new devil. I'd think if someone had a reliable workaround, the third party remanufacturers would have it all over the web.
ReplyDeleteThe printer guys must be the same people who did Uhbamacare - all expensive hat, no cattle.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
I bought my HP printer, Model C7180 All-in-One, 6 years ago during the Christmas season at an Office Depot when they had a Christmas-time sale going on. Since then it has given me absolutely no trouble at all, at all, save for a rare paper jam that takes less than a minute to take care of. It uses 5 color cartridges and one black one. I get the refilled cartridges from Office Depot for less than $10.00 each with the black one costing just over $15.00. They usually last for 4 to 5 months before needing replacement.
ReplyDeleteIf my present HP ever decides to die, I will damn sure buy another HP.
My local library will print anything for ten cents a page. E-mail to them, or to myself, whatever. F*** Hewlett peckered..
ReplyDelete