“
|
A
FINE FOOD FIGHT
By now,
everyone knows that Mitt Romney’s inner circle was
righteously peeved at New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie for spending the
final days of the 2012 presidential race arm-in-arm with President
Obama as they toured the Jersey coastline after its thrashing by
Hurricane Sandy. The buddy-buddy act boxed Romney out of national media
coverage for days while lending the president some bipartisan street
cred.
But it wasn’t just the storm. Christie had rankled Romney’s team
throughout the campaign: He held back his endorsement as long as
possible, flirted with big-shot GOP donors who begged him to jump into
the race and used his prime-time address at the Republican National
Convention to puff up his Garden State record — without mentioning
Romney once.
“And it will hit Christie first.
Halperin and Heilemann make abundant use of a vice-presidential vetting
file dropped into their hands by someone in Romney’s orbit to
illuminate secrets about the governor. Delivering the documents to the
authors was a stunning breach of political decorum that can only be
read as a giant middle finger at Christie and his aides.
According to the authors, Romney and his team were shaken by what they
discovered about Christie during “Project Goldfish,” as the hush-hush
veep search process was known. His “disturbing” research file is
littered with “garish controversies,” the authors write: a Justice
Department investigation into his free-spending ways as U.S. attorney,
his habit of steering government contracts to friends and political
allies, a defamation lawsuit that emerged during a 1994 run for local
office, a politically problematic lobbying career that included work on
behalf of a financial firm that employed Bernie Madoff. And that’s not
to mention the Romney team’s anxiety about the governor’s girth.
For Christie, who is coasti to rengelection
on Tuesday and already laying
behind-the-scenes groundwork for a 2016 presidential bid, the book’s
revelations are a Drudge-ready public relations nightmare that will
send his advisers scrambling to explain awkward aspects of his record
and his personal life just as he is stepping onto the national stage.”
It's
a proper food fight, but now I know all I want to know. No book
buy for you.
The
book’s loose argument is that both Obama and Romney placed their
bets about the race early on and “doubled down” throughout the contest.
It’s an apt take on Obama World. The “Obamans,” as the authors call
them, set out to annihilate Romney almost two years before the election
and executed their plan with brutal efficiency. There were hiccups
along the way, specifically Obama’s dreary debate-prep sessions and his
cringe-worthy performance in Denver, but his deputies in Chicago rarely
deviated from their search-and-destroy mission. Romney’s campaign,
though, with its bad habit of reacting to news cycles with snap
decisions, always felt more ad hoc, with tactics trumping strategy.
|
|
” |
|
For what it's worth, of Firfox, Chrome, and IE, only IE displays this as it was designed.
ReplyDeleteI have a loosely based theory, that it may not matter what a candidate actually says anymore. Hear me out on this.
ReplyDeleteThe candidate is on screen/microphone for a few minutes or seconds, and few actually see/hear it. Even the broadcast debates are viewed by a relative few; most "citizens" would rather be watching Pawn Stars or re-runs of Gilligan's Island or just any damn thing else, maybe Golden Girls or whatever. So if the electorate hears anything, for the most part it's the media and pundits mindlessly prattling on telling half the story, or out-and-out lying, or perhaps Jon Stewart or that mindless shit on HBO talking up whomever they think are pretty and demeaning those they do not like. Probably more know who Jon Stewart is, than Nancy Pelosi.
So I really don't think if the candidate is a media darling, they could say anything wrong, or if they are out of favor with the media, they could say anything right, but mostly, I don't think very many people in the electorate are listening.
I mean, how else do you explain the current administration?
Sir H the Comet
Crisp Crispie is a one trick pony and a one way prick.
ReplyDeleteI hope he's fried.
Would the former Chris Christi supporters on here please step forward so I can rub it in. I caught a lot of hell for calling this one.
ReplyDeleteHe hit the headlines for standing up to NJ teachers' union early in his governorship, and it's the only thng he's done really right. He's slid back into Proggyland ever since.
ReplyDeleteLt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick