[...] This kind of attack is going to become more frequent.The
slap-fight fascists at the Orwellian named Human Rights Campaign
(because their actions demonstrate that they are only in favor of human
rights so long as sodomy is involved) is gearing up a campaign directed
at Catholic prelates who are vocal about adhering to Scripture and
Tradition (both of which proscribe what the HRC is in favor of):
The LGBT group has announced an activist effort targeting eight bishops
in a pamphlet that labels them as “the best of the worst Catholic
bishops across the country.”
Its campaign will target Cardinal Francis George of Chicago, Archbishop
Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco, Archbishop John Nienstedt of St.
Paul and Minneapolis, Archbishop Dennis Schnurr of Cincinnati,
Archbishop Joseph Kurtz of Louisville, Ky., the president of the U.S.
bishops’ conference, Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia,
Archbishop William Lori of Baltimore and Bishop Thomas Paprocki of
Springfield, Ill.
The effort aims to target bishops the activist group claims have been
“most outspoken in their rejection of LGBT Catholics, their civil
rights and their rightful place in the Church.” The effort will include
Rosary events and literature distributions in the bishops’ home cities.
Attacks on Christians who adhere to Christian doctrine actually does us
a favor. First off, it pull the mask off the ugly face of sexual
deviance revealing it the monstrosity it is. Second, it give Christians
everywhere a wake up call that you can’t cooperate with moral evil such
as abortion and homosexual activity and expect the evil to not turn on
you.
[Full]
In fairness the guy sounds like bad news. I have no idea why someone would want a DNA database of law abiding citizens (which is probably unConstitutional in any case) but the rest of his platform, at least as summarized in the cartoon is pure bad news.
ReplyDelete.
And all that has what to do with being RC?
ReplyDeleteA lobbyist sitting in government? Wouldn't matter who or what he was a lobbyist for, that's a clear conflict of interest.
ReplyDeleteAnd, if he's lobbying to impose any sort of religious views on the state it's inappropriate at best (and a step towards violating the first ammendment).
The rest of the points ...
.