The reporter for the Washington Post’s blog, The Plum Line, is
described by the news outlet thusly:
“Greg Sargent writes The
Plum
Line blog, a reported opinion blog with a liberal slant – what you
might call ‘opinionated reporting’ from the left. He joined the Post in
early 2009, after stints at Talking Points Memo, New York Magazine and
the New York Observer.”
So,
Sargent is identified as the go-to-guy that enables the DNC to “help
control the narrative on the front end.” He delivers the mail for the
Party.
Wikileaks revealed, within the 74 emails where Sargent’s name in
mentioned in Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails, that the
substance of Sargent’s “opinionated” columns comes not from his keen
analysis of political events, nor is it rooted solely in his liberal,
political philosophy. Instead, his particular slant leans heavily
on
DNC input where support for the Clinton candidacy is, and has been from
the start of this election cycle, firmly established.
In short, Sargent is a DNC-Clinton shill on the payroll of the
Washington Post.
[Full,
with examples]
In addition to coordinating his blog columns with DNC communicators,
Sargent is a conduit for DNC talking points that travel through him to
rank-and-file Washington Post (WaPo) reporters.
Unfortunately, your analysis of the impact of this "breaking news" is spot on.
ReplyDelete