Thursday, June 29, 2017

Because Algore cannot be ridiculed enough



Warning: Algore uses bad language

Please, sir, may I have some more?

Res Ipsa Loquitur        

Democrats Despair over Neil Gorsuch: ‘We’ve Got Another Scalia’

STUPIDITY



Death by Irony







AHEM

STATE OF ‘COLLAPSE’: ITALY OVERWHELMED AS 13,500 AFRICAN MIGRANTS ARRIVE IN PAST TWO DAYS

We are witnessing the fall of Europe. They’ve reached a tipping point — a point of no return.

“The government continues to show a worrying powerlessness in the face of a situation that becomes more and more dramatic every day,” said Paolo Romani, president of the senators of Forza Italy.

On Tuesday, 8,500 African migrants are reaching Italian shores aboard 14 different ships, adding to the 5,000 who arrived on Monday. The massive arrivals have led local media as well as politicians to speak of an authentic immigrant “invasion” exceeding the country’s capacity of assimilation.

Black Markers Matter





Wednesday, June 28, 2017

TODAY'S TIP



My (age-8) granddaughter's mother enrolled her in golf  camp.  Why?  Because, evidently, collegiate women's  golf has exploded, and demand far exceeds  supply.  So, it seems, a girl with two years on her high school golf team is a lock for a scholarship.  

Five Things


Hold the chovys


My lips are sealed (Click ..) on advice from (..Click) my attorney




"Every one is welcome except police, right wing groups .... "



 

It's about time ...

Zippety Doo-Dah

Dispatch from a double agent





Today's Cheeky Content




Gerry Mander (D)

       WHAT THIS GUMMINT DOES
     

    Politicians are redrawing district
lines and this is a problem





The process of redrawing electoral district lines to give a political party an advantage in elections.



Gerrymandering has become a big problem in states like Maryland where some neighborhoods have wound up split into as many as four different congressional districts. The paint-by-numbers congressional map could soon get a facelift due to some important court cases.

Gerrymandering in Crofton

Her neighbors in Anne Arundel County have had a hard time petitioning lawmakers on important issues like hospital and school funding, and in many cases the districts become so confusing that people do not know who their representatives are.
Jennifer Bevan-Dangel has lived in the same house in Crofton, MD for 10 years, but in 2012 local officials redrew congressional district lines and split her community in half.

"We have lived in two different congressional districts just by staying in the exact same house," Bevan-Dangel said.

That line change is called gerrymandering, and it can cause a lot of problems in places like Crofton.

Those wonky district lines can cause big problems in communities that find themselves divided up among multiple congressional districts.

Bevan-Dangel said her neighbors in Anne Arundel County have had a hard time petitioning lawmakers on important issues like hospital and school funding, and in many cases the districts become so confusing that people do not know who their representatives are.

<snip>

Taking gerrymandering to court

The "paint by numbers" congressional maps could be reigned in soon thanks to a slew of court cases challenging gerrymandering practices.

One lawsuit headed to the U.S. federal district court of appeals in Maryland argues the state's Democratic-leaning districts violate Republican's first amendment rights.

And the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a similar case out of Wisconsin where Democrats hope to prove gerrymandering is leading to a significant amount of wasted votes, violating their constitutional rights.

Francois says the court will have to determine if there is a point at which officials gerrymander so blatantly "to the extent that it becomes almost anti-democratic."

He added that until the court reaches a verdict on that case, other gerrymandering cases are in limbo.

<snip>

Gov. Larry Hogan (R-MD) and former Gov. Martin O'Malley (D-MD) have both said publicly that they would like to see independent redistricting commissions formed to examine the gerrymandering in Maryland.

Hogan proposed legislation last year to create a panel, but Democrats in the state legislature have called for national or redistricting reform instead. [FULL]

I live across  the street from people  represented by Maryland's only Republican?; Rep. Andy Harris (who dismissed President Trump’s proposed federal budget and backed the congressional investigation into his campaign’s ties to Russia).   I get Rep. Anthony G Brown (who tweeted: "Skipping Inauguration. @RepJohnLewis a civil rights hero). So, you might say that I am disenfranchised. 

Oyez Oyez OYES





“For those of us who work in marbled halls, guarded constantly by a vigilant and dedicated police force, the guarantees of the Second Amendment might seem antiquated and superfluous,” Thomas wrote after most members of the court declined to hear the California case.

my photoshop



Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas had stern words for his colleagues when the court declined to hear a case challenging California’s handgun laws, saying that the jurists do not understand the importance of self-defense.

The case, supported by the National Rifle Association, involves San Diego resident Edward Peruta, who challenged his county’s refusal to grant him permission to carry a concealed firearm outside of his home.

“But the Framers made a clear choice: They reserved to all Americans the right to bear arms for self-defense. I do not think we should stand by idly while a State denies its citizens that right, particularly when their very lives may depend on it,” Thomas said.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, the court’s newest member, joined Thomas’ statement on the court’s refusal to hear the case, calling the decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Peruta v. San Diego “indefensible.”

A case needs to be approved by at least four justices in order to get on the Supreme Court’s docket.

“The Second Amendment’s core purpose further supports the conclusion that the right to bear arms extends to public carry,” Thomas wrote. “Even if other Members of the Court do not agree that the Second Amendment likely protects a right to public carry, the time has come for the Court to answer this important question definitively.”

The San Diego County Sheriff’s Department has very narrow restrictions for concealed carry permits. Only those who can prove they have a regular need for self-defense against a specific threat are granted concealed permits.

“The whole point of the Sheriff’s policy is to confine concealed-carry licenses to a very narrow subset of law-abiding residents,” Peruta’s attorneys wrote. “And because California law prohibits openly carrying a handgun outside the home, the result is that the typical law-abiding resident cannot bear a handgun for self-defense outside the home at all.” [FULL Signal]

He is a gift from God, IMO, and a national treasure.

Fine Fettered Friends

On the same page with America's Democrats


Tuesday, June 27, 2017

WHAM! BANG! THUMP!









.

The lawsuit has to do with an editorial the NYT ran on June 14 that falsely smeared Palin as inciting the 2011 shooting of Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords by a mentally ill man. There is no evidence to support the NYT’s implication that Palin played a role in inciting the Giffords shooting.


The Kill Shot?






Project Veritas has confirmed via an Atlanta based CNN producer that the Russia hysteria concerning President Donald Trump is in fact a political witch hunt. 

Sheriff Joe v. Rat Bastards


Obama's  Mustache                           






Sheriff Joe, Unlike the Obama Cartel,
is backed by the Constitution so wtf?
There are only two Law Enforcement officers in America; The County Sheriff and the US Marshal.

A common complaint from Sheriffs is, “I cannot arrest a judge without first getting the prosecutor to agree otherwise the prosecutor may refuse to prosecute.” The question that begs answering is where did the prosecutor get such power? Certainly We the People did not give it to them in the Constitution and certainly congress can make no Law that we did not give them the power to make. We the People did not ordain the prosecutor “Chief Law Enforcer”, but the Sheriff! Solution: if the prosecutor refuses to prosecute they should be arrested for “felony rescue”.



The Sheriff and the U.S. Marshal just like We the People have lost their way. We have forgotten who we are and by what authority we act upon and therefore our servants rule over us.

There are only two Law Enforcement officers in America; The County Sheriff and the US Marshal. The sheriff is the only elected law enforcer whose duty it is to protect the unalienable rights of the People both in the court room and within the county. While the U.S. Marshal is responsible for protecting the unalienable rights of the People in the Federal Court room.

The Sheriff is the only person able to call for the posse comitatus (Latin, Power of the county) Referred at Common Law to all males over the age of fifteen on whom a sheriff could call for assistance in preventing any type of civil disorder. Today, under a national emergency the Sheriff is both the first and last line of defense should our government go rouge; since congress has been derelict of duty in the providing for the militia.

The Sheriff and the U.S. Marshal just like We the People have lost their way. We have forgotten who we are and by what authority we act upon and therefore our servants rule over us.
There are forces within our government that are doing everything they can to prevent that from happening.
U.S. Constitution Article I Section 8 clauses 15 and 16: "The Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"

U.S. Constitution Article I Section 8 clauses 15 and 16: "The Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"

The Bill of Rights makes clear two (2) things (1) A well regulated militia is an unalienable right and (2) a well regulated militia is necessary to our security.

Amendment II "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Today all seats of government have unlawfully incorporated and therefore all police forces (city, town, village, state, etc.) work for corporations and owe their allegiance to the corporation, therein “code enforcement officers”; whereas Sheriffs and Marshals are “constitutional officers” owing allegiance to the People. There exists no Constitutional authority for police forces.

U.S. Constitution Article VI clause 2: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

The Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights are founded under common law, a/k/a the Supreme Law of the Land. ALL CASES AT LAW: Black's Law 4th, "within constitutional guaranty of jury trial, refers to common law actions as distinguished from causes in equity and certain other proceedings." Breimhorst v. Beck-man, 227 Minn. 409, 35 N.W.2d 719, 734.

The Sheriff and the U.S. Marshal just like We the People have lost their way. We have forgotten who we are and by what authority we act upon and therefore our servants rule over us. The purpose of this site is to help us find our way back to the Liberties our founding fathers discovered and pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to establish for themselves and their posterity. It is now our turn, our duty, to re-discover our roots for ourselves and our posterity. There are forces within our government that are doing everything they can to prevent that from happening. These people are called progressives and over the years they have taken control of both major parties and thereby methodically removed civics, God and constitutional studies from our education and through the media, entertainment and education have demoralized us.

What We the People and our Sheriffs need to know is that:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Preamble to the U.S. Constitution.

When we the People ordained Common Law, U.S. Constitution Article VI, the Supreme Law of the Land We the People took control of all decision making within the courts through Grand and Trial Juries and the Common Law Sheriff became the only Law Enforcer of the court and the county. The common law court is well established and defined in history, Blacks Law and Bouviers Law.

“The Sheriff is the “Chief Executive and Administrative Officer” of a county chosen by popular election. His principal duties are in aid of the criminal and civil courts of record [common law courts]; such as serving process, summoning juries, executing judgments, holding judicial sales and the like. He is also the chief conservator of the peace within his territorial jurisdiction.” Harston v. Langston, Tex.Civ. App., 292 S.W. 648, 650.

The word "Sheriff" is a contraction of the term "shire reeve", meaning a royal official responsible for keeping the peace throughout a shire or county on behalf of the king(s). We the People “Ordained” the Constitution for the United States of America which puts the People as the said kings above the Constitution and our elected servants under the Constitution, therein the great American experiment. Our servants have no more power than that which We the People gave them and any law they write to the contrary is null and void as if it has never been passed; as we read:

"All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491

<SNIP>

A common complaint from Sheriffs is, “I cannot arrest a judge without first getting the prosecutor to agree otherwise the prosecutor may refuse to prosecute.” The question that begs answering is where did the prosecutor get such power? Certainly We the People did not give it to them in the Constitution and certainly congress can make no Law that we did not give them the power to make. We the People did not ordain the prosecutor “Chief Law Enforcer”, but the Sheriff! Solution: if the prosecutor refuses to prosecute they should be arrested for “felony rescue”.

The Sheriff is not to go begging the prosecutor for an indictment, he shouldn’t even be going to the prosecutor at all, but to the Grand Jury directly and ask them for an indictment. The problem is that the Judge and the prosecutor deny Sheriffs and the People access to the Grand Jury. After six years of practicing law without a BAR degree we found out that many judges and prosecutors have something to hide so they protect each other by blocking access to the Grand Jury, they fear what you may ask of the Grand Jury.

So, if the Sheriff needs to ask permission, he’s not the Chief and he passes his duties to others, and any Sheriff that does that is in “Bad Behavior”. If the Sheriff cannot get access to the Jury Administrators (a/k/a Commissioners of Jurors) directly he has the power and authority to summons 25 People, out of any pool (phone book, etc.) to the courthouse jury room and ask for an indictment.

We the People did not give prosecutors power to negotiate deals with People under indictment. Prosecutors may propose the deal to the Grand Jury for decision; but the arrangement must offer a plan for restitution acceptable to the injured party or due process, trial by jury, must run its course. "The Full Deck"

TODAY


WASHINGTON, D.C. – After failing to clean the DOJ swamp of attorneys still loyal to President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and President Trump are standing silent as former Sheriff Joe Arpaio begins a criminal trial in Maricopa County, Arizona, that could send the 85-year-old famed law enforcement officer to prison for contempt of court.

I cannot begin to understand  how this happening. In a nutshell, Obama's DOJ  (Eric Holder) fired the first shot in the plan to defy United States immigration  law by flooding AZ with new voters illegal aliens from Mexico. Sherriff Joe said "no way Jose."  In March 2009, Holder's DOJ notified Arpaio that they were investigating him for civil rights violations, in unfairly targeting Hispanics and Spanish-speaking people , and subequently found "reasonable cause to believe that MCSO engages in a pattern or practice of violating the Constitution and laws of the United States" 

 In 2013, U.S. District Court Judge Murray Snow ruled in a civil lawsuit in which a number of Hispanic individuals represented by the ACLU alleged racial profiling by the Sheriff's Office. Among other remedies, Judge Snow appointed a court monitor to oversee compliance with his orders that included video cameras in every police car, and training of staff. Further controversy erupted when department training videos surfaced in which Judge Snow's orders were trivialized, so now 
Arpaio faces a bench trial before  U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton – a federal judge appointed by President Clinton.

Which is  WHY TRUMP WHITE HOUSE AND SESSIONS DOJ MUST HELP SHERIFF ARPAIO

Zippety Doo-Dah

When Women Were Women



Tom Mann

Hilarity ensues



 








The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, said today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court allowing a limited version of the Trump administration’s “Muslim ban” executive orders to take effect ignores the Islamophobic origins of the policy and emboldens Islamophobes in the Trump administration


Christians who celebrate the Supreme Court decision to allow part of the "Muslim Ban" forget that Jesus himself was a refugee/migrant. SMH. (Dr. Craig Considine )

Dem Pol Builds Resume





WaPo Gang Wang's Trump


WAPO Pushes Fake News That Thomas Jefferson
Held WH Iftar Dinner to ‘Celebrate Ramadan’

Amy B. Wang of the Washington Post led the pack with this nonsense

Monday, June 26, 2017

I know teach!.. I know.. I know. Call on me!!





“The Flynn leaks were nothing short of political,” one FBI employee said, noting the specific contents of the conversation were known by only a handful of government officials when they leaked. “The leaks appeared to be targeted to take Flynn out.”





Eventually the probe on Flynn moved beyond Russia to questions about whether he properly disclosed foreign payments affecting his security clearance.

FBI officials declined to answer any questions from Circa, including whether McCabe ever considered recusing himself or has recused himself from the Flynn aspects of the Russia probe. McCabe declined comment via the FBI press office.[Full]

From the article: “The FBI sought to block Flynn’s support for the agent, asking a federal administrative law judge in May 2014 to keep Flynn and others from becoming a witness in her Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) case, memos obtained by Circa show. Two years later, the FBI opened its inquiry of Flynn. The EEOC case, which is still pending, was serious enough to require McCabe to submit to a sworn statement to investigators, the documents show. . .Three FBI employees told Circa they personally witnessed McCabe make disparaging remarks about Flynn before and during the time the retired Army general emerged as a figure in the Russia case. . .FBI agents’ concerns became more pronounced when a highly-classified piece of evidence — an intercepted conversation between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak — suddenly leaked to the news media and prompted Flynn’s resignation as Trump’s top security adviser. ‘The Flynn leaks were nothing short of political,’ one FBI employee said, noting the specific contents of the conversation were known by only a handful of government officials when they leaked. ‘The leaks appeared to be targeted to take Flynn out.’. . .” (comment by fedora on Free Republic)


Fact is, I haven't trusted any government agency since Obama took office, so I imagined the worst.  I just didn't imagine big enough. (Nice catch by skoonj.)

*spit*

It's June 26, 1942. Extrapolate


 







"I guess Trump had actual work to do and didn't want to waste his day virtue signaling"

How nice to have a president who actually represents Americans."



TIME

Don't talk with your mouth full, she said





FAKE!



.
For the first time in I don't know how long, the preponderance of news——real news——suggests the rout is on.  This is only a smattering of what's crossed my desk in the last few days.  So much, in fact, I really didn't know where to begin. Here's a sampling.




 
T. Mann

Investigation Backfires: Democrats Accidentally Expose Obama
Leftist Democrats opened Pandora’s box. And you thought karma is a bitch?
Now, Obama and his administration find themselves in harm’s way
Bernie and Jane Sanders Under FBI Investigation Related To Alleged Bank Fraud


DHS John Kelly Defunds, Disinvites Islamic Groups Favored By Barack Obama skoonj

NOT SO SPECIAL COUNSEL: Time for POTUS to fight fire with fire
It is unconstitutional to issue a search warrant when there has been no crime and there is no probable cause.  But that is exactly what President Trump's DOJ has inflicted on the president and his team with Mueller's special investigation.  It was not just cowardice, but folly for the DOJ to buckle to the left-wing media's hysterical insistence to investigate our president's alleged collusion with the FSB. 

Very Fake News: CNN Chief Jeff Zucker Takes Reins of Investigation into Retracted Russia Conspiracy Story
skoonj

Sketchy firm behind Trump dossier is stalling investigators
More, federal records show a key co-founder and partner in the firm was a Hillary Clinton donor and supporter of her presidential campaign.

Dershowitz: Trump Right to Challenge Mueller-Comey Friendship

Finally, because it needs to be remembered
Al Gore sued by over 30,000 Scientists for Global Warming fraud John Coleman