|
| The industrious reader will read today's "In passing" link to the New York Times continued scandalous manipuilation of the exposed climate fraud. Meanwhile - Greg Pierce, citing David Warren in the Ottawa Citizen:
|
| “
|
"More generally, we have been given the materials with which to obtain
an insight into how all modern science works when vast amounts of
public funding is at stake and when the vested interests associated
with various 'progressive' causes require a particular scientific
result.
"There is little doubt that the e-mails were real. Even so warmist a
true-believer as George Monbiot led his column in the Guardian
[Tuesday] with: 'It's no use pretending this isn't a major blow. The
e-mails extracted ... could scarcely be more damaging. I am now
convinced that they are genuine, and I'm dismayed and deeply shaken by
them.' ...
"It is amusing to see mainstream media sources such as the New York
Times, which thinks nothing of publishing purloined government
documents that will endanger the lives of U.S. soldiers in the field
and compromise vital intelligence operations, suddenly become all jowly
and uptight about publishing the e-mails in question because they were
'illegally obtained.'
"Other media - which have played a leading part for years in giving
credibility to 'global warming' claims - are now maintaining the
silence of Iago on the revelations. We will see how long this can be
sustained."
|
” |
|
