|
Brietbart is here
Shining
the light here boss
| “
|
- QUESTION: In what new ways to you intend to
rectify
the inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females
making only 72 percent of what their male counterparts earn?
It was at this point that the questions
began coming completely off the rails –
- QUESTION: Mr. Romney, what do you plan on
doing
with immigrants without their green cards that are currently living
here as productive members of society?
This question was geared by Crowley to help President Obama among
Hispanics
- QUESTION: President Obama, during the
Democratic
National Convention in 2008, you stated you wanted to keep AK-47s out
of the hands of criminals. What has your administration done or planned
to do to limit the availability of assault weapons?
Precisely nobody outside the far left
cares about this question. Nobody. [Full
article]
This
ought come as no surprise to anyone. The left control who gets to
participate, and the idea is to embarras the Republican- always.
It
rarely works, however, and didn't here.
|
|
” |
|
It only makes sense. Anyone undecided at this time has to be as dumb as a Democrat.
ReplyDeleteOh, yeah -- like those paste-eaters really came up with those questions...
ReplyDelete"Mr Romney? when did you stop beating your wife? And why do you hate dogs?"
I turned it off right after that young airhead twat ask about how to fix the income inequality of wymyn, which according to said twat, is only 72% that of men.
ReplyDeleteSure wish Romney would have slam dunked that with facts such as “go to engineering school, stay in the workforce all your life (no parental leaves dearie), start a small business (oops, too hard), quit bitching about men having urinals and using cusswords and PRODUCE SOMETHING USEFUL, and with the benefit of affirmative action, you will make more than men with the same skillset. I will not mandate equal income for those who choose to persue an education in a glutted field with no markets or no practical use; e.g., for Angry Studies majors.”
Instead, he read off a litany of how fair and considerate he was of women in his Massachusetts administration. Whoop-de-doo. That one was time for a chop to the neck and a kick in the teeth, not a make nice-nice.
And Crowley bent over to kiss Uhbama’s ass.
Did you look at that audience? I thought I was looking at a remake of the Star Wars bar scene with Dumb and Dumber in the cast. Skulls full of mush and skulls full of concrete cast in uber liberal forms. Average IQ about 38. Average emotional age about 16.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
Candy Crowley's disgraceful performance.
ReplyDeleteOf course she was a disgrace — WE WIN.
1) The questions, the time cheating, the interruptions, the interjections; a total package of transparent bias for Barry0. So the meta-message to the audience was a 2 on 1 with Romney strong enough to take on both of them. Crowley stupidly allowed him to play the role of both victim and winner.
2) Every trained salesman will tell you he can't make a sale if he doesn't get the chance to address objections. Crowley gave him this gift, albeit unintentionally. Romney ran with it.
Rodge, you still don't like Romney because he refuses to present himself as a raving Rightwing Wacko. I know it would have been fun if he had thrown a knee in Barry0's groin as they passed on stage. But that doesn't win elections. I'm here to telya, Romney knows more about selling and winning than all of us put together. That is exactly why viewers rated him distinctly superior on every issue that was measured after the debate. It's just a question of whether the Americans will outvote the looters.
"Rodge, you still don't like Romney because he refuses to present himself as a raving Rightwing Wacko."
ReplyDeleteFalse premise.
Hahaha, so long as my conclusions are true, we still win.
ReplyDeleteWHAT YOU SAW: An honest, decent, very religious, RINO loser.
WHAT I SAW: A Massachusetts politician who did whatever it took to beat the Democrats at their own game in the most corrupt state in the Union.