[SNIP]
From the outset, Mr. Cashill expertly destroys the myth that a cover-up
and conspiracy involving TWA Flight 800 to prevent the truth from being
known would take too many people to accomplish. It’s a common and
legitimate argument, yet one that Mr. Cashill painstakingly and adeptly
rebuts by describing how the magnitude of the TWA 800 deception
actually helped protect it.
He describes how the investigation was ultimately directed by the
highest people within our own government and how the flow of
information was expertly controlled through the careful placement and
discreet handling of agency heads. In this and other common
conspiracies, it’s all about controlling the gatekeepers of the
information.
There
were nearly 700 eyewitnesses to what happened to TWA Flight 800 on that
fateful night. Of those witnesses, 258 people saw an object ascending
from the horizon to the aircraft, leaving a signature contrail in its
wake. Another dozen additional witnesses saw what could be described as
a missile strike and the passenger aircraft breaking up and falling
into the Atlantic in about 120 feet of water.
Specific to the cover-up and conspiracy involving TWA 800, it should
surprise no one that all roads lead directly the Clinton White House
and Clinton-era newsrooms. This is a situation that has continued
inside and outside of the beltway and one that has been reinvigorated
and reinforced for the upcoming 2016 election.
The astute reader and honest investigative journalist will be able to
see the emergence of a familiar strategy of information containment and
political damage control orchestrated by the “Clinton cabal,” past and
present. In this and numerous other situations potentially damaging to
the political aspirations and ambitions of these serial liars and their
abettors, their behavioral profile becomes clear. Tactics employed on
the night of July 17, 1996, did not begin then, but much earlier. Nor
have they stopped, but continue today.
Having a compliant infrastructure already in place and a captured media
ready to direct an already fatigued public away from the truth,
including a certain few ‘investigative journalists’ to give the false
appearance of honesty, inconvenient truths can be more easily contained
and managed. Under the pretext of exposing scandalous activity, the
public’s attention can be diverted away from far more serious criminal
actions. It’s an effective strategy used by the media, and a
comfortably profitable enterprise for certain journalists and pundits
willing to compromise truth for the warm glow of the spotlight, however
fleeting. To them, the lives of the victims be damned, along with the
truth.
Additionally,
and even more telling, the footage captured the activities of a FBI
agent trying to flatten out a piece of metal with a hammer. Shaping the
narrative, perhaps literally.
In all such instances, it is obvious that the objective was to remove
or change the evidence to better fit the official account of the
Clinton White House.
Then there are the career politicians and agency heads placed in
certain key political, intelligence and even military positions. Their
tactics of containing the truth and misdirecting the public becomes
even easier, especially if convinced that perpetuating a lie is not
merely a matter of loyalty, but an issue of national security. Ending
the careers of those who see through the charade or who are unwilling
to assist becomes blood sport, while those who agree to play are
handsomely rewarded.
If this operational strategy sounds familiar, it should. We have seen
Hillary Clinton use the same tactics in her position as Secretary of
State as she dealt with the loss of life in Benghazi and her
continually troublesome e-mails. Previously, it was Whitewater, the
strange death of Vince Foster, Travelgate, et al. Again, the
operational strategy is from the same playbook, the same set of plays,
and in some cases, the same players today, some twenty years after TWA
800.
[FULL
REPORT]
I was in NYC the night the plane went down. I remember hearing the live interviews with people on boats on Long Island Sound; their accounts of seeing what they perceived as a missile sounded very credible.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I know Jack Cashill, and he's a very thorough researcher and writer. Remember, Jack is the one who, through literary forensics, all but proved that "Dreams From My Father" was written by Bill Ayers.
A decade or so ago, I knew an A&P/IA (big credentials FAA type) who was one of the most skilled metallurgist in N. America. He did lots of expert testimonial work. He did work for the defense industry in regards to aircraft damage on drone test beds that had been destroyed in air. He told me he spent a week in the hangar with TWA 800, the plane had been reassembled on a huge jig, he did microscopic analysis of the tears in the metal. He said he saw no sign of missile impact, the seams tore on expansion. Bomb or fuel tank. But no bomb residue.
ReplyDeleteMost if not all of the bodies of the passengers were recovered and autopsied. This metal tube was basically filled with ballistic gel. The effects of a missile would have been evident among the bodies. -Anymouse
Did you read the article anyone?
ReplyDeleteI am better with picture stories but it was worth a read. I have a conspiracy friend that I have routinely giggled at over the years that has me looking for a second time at some of these events.
ReplyDeleteHoly Smokes, ya got me Rog, I thought you had reprinted this from AmThinker yesterday.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/06/when_the_government_lies_twa_flight_800.html
I haven't been so embarrassed since I told Kim du Toit the .223 was an acceptable elk round. The AmThink article is funny because he talks about the mechanical knowledge of Marine Phantom pilots. I sent it to all my Phantom Phixer buds. We laughed...-Anymouse
Why would you think we didn't read it?
ReplyDeleteBecause anons(11:20) argument is obviated by videos showing FBI agents destroying and altering the physical evidence in the hanger..
ReplyDelete