This blog is
directed at those in the conservative movement who find
my existence grotesque. You know who you are. You are the
people that
do not know how to get from point A to point B without being led around
by the nose. You are the people who might be able to recite
Jefferson,
Madison, Washington and other founding fathers but cannot understand
what you are quoting and the meaning of those words. " J.J.
Jackson
”
Â
" I don't think I've ever met a Liberal whom I didn't like on a personal basis. That said, if your goal is to change minds and influence people, it's probably not a good idea to begin by asserting that virtually all elected Democrats are liars. But what the hell."
The high Muck-a-Mucks in the GOP fear her appeal to base conservatives. Socialist Democrats fear her appeal to Reagan Democrats, and hate her for it. The media fear her appeal to the thinking American . Obama feared her appeal and is trying to crush her.
Yes! Sarah Palin is TEH HER!
She's washed up? And political hacks from both parties can't stop bashing her? Oh.
There is a real element of truth, however. The Republican party leadership are at their core all RINO. The hate Palin for her independence, and staunch conservative values.
I Hate the idea of a 3rd Party BUT:The Conservative Party is long overdue: Big Government types on both sides are working against everything most conservatives believe in. Rob
I don't believe a 3-party system is sustainable, but in the near term is necessary. The Republican party will disappear, with many becoming democrats - also a good thing. Anything to deStalinize it.
Wikipedia just can't seem to make up its mind about where President Barack Obama was born.
The free, online encyclopedia this afternoon displayed at least two
countries the commander in chief may have been born in – the United
States and Kenya.
WND documented how the entry for the "Early life and career of Barack Obama" changed numerous times.
At 4:45 p.m. Eastern, Wikipedia said:
"Barack Obama, the current President of the United States, was born on
August 4, 1961 in either Honolulu, in the state of Hawaii[1], or
Mombasa, Kenya, to Barack Obama, Sr. (1936–1982) (born in Nyang’oma
Kogelo, Siaya District, Nyanza Province,[2] Kenya Colony, British
Empire), and Ann Dunham (1942–1995) (born in Fort Leavenworth,
Kansas).[3][4] On his mother's side he has a half-sister; on his
father's side, Obama has two half-sisters and five surviving
half-brothers.[5]"
”
The answer to Just who delivered baby Barack Obama? may
be forthcoming. My inside sources have gained these
photographs scheduled for release by The Daily KOS, which
"prove" a Hawaiian birth. A real setback to "birthers" who continue to question Obama's citizenship.
EXCLUSIVE BIRTH PICTURES
Above
Left: Ann Dunham and Barack Obama arrive by taxi at Honolulu's Kapi'olani
Medical Center for Women and Children in the nick of time. Right:
Picture taken by nurse at Honolulu's Kapi'olani Medical Center for
Women and Children captured the very moment Dr. Brian O'Shea (left) delivered Barry Obama into the world. (August 4, 1961)
Do ya think he'll take a chance on coming to the Good ol' US of A for treatment? Or will he operate on hisself and effect a cure? Wonder what a Doc would do, scalpel in hand, here ... and for that matter in NorK... would he survive surgery?
The Free Press editorialized Wednesday -- "Your taxes at work for
the NRA (and Cox)" -- against my filing of a legal brief with the U.S.
Supreme Court that supports the National Rifle Association's challenge
of a Chicago ordinance banning the possession of most handguns.
My
support for this challenge to the Chicago gun ban is rooted in
Michigan's own Constitution, which states: "Every person has a right to
keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state."
My
defense of this constitutional principle is longstanding. In 2007, I
filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in opposition to the
District of Columbia's drastic ban on guns, arguing that the Second
Amendment's right "to keep and bear arms" is an individual right. The
Supreme Court agreed with that position and overturned the D.C. ban in
its Heller decision.
The
Free Press failed to mention that 34 attorneys general signed on to the
NRA's challenge of Chicago's strict gun ban, including both Democrats
and Republicans. This isn't about politics; it's about standing up for
principle.
It may
come as news to the Free Press, but this office files amicus briefs all
the time to protect the rights of the state and its citizens. For
example, this office has filed amicus briefs in support of the Big
Three auto industry and tougher standards to protect the Great Lakes.
In
my own experience of more than 13 years as a homicide prosecutor and
head of the homicide unit of the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, I
never saw anyone charged with murder who had a license to legally carry
a concealed weapon. Most people who want to possess guns are
law-abiding and present no threat to others. Rather than the
availability of weapons, my experience is that gun violence is driven
by culture, police presence, or the lack of same, and failures in the
supervision of parolees and probationers.
Since
becoming attorney general, I have worked to ensure that the rights of
Michigan citizens to defend themselves are protected. For example, I
have expanded the number of states that recognize Michigan CCW permits
from eight states to 35 states. And I'll continue to take action when
constitutional principles are threatened.
I make no apologies for my support of the Constitution and the Second Amendment.
Mike Cox
Michigan Attorney General, Lansing
”
Mike
Cox (born 1961) is the 52nd Michigan Attorney General, having served
since January 1, 2003. He is the first Republican in 48 years to serve
as Attorney General of Michigan since Frank Millard left office in
1955. Here's just one example of what Democrats missed in the intervening 48 years (She resigned)
CHURCHVILLE,
VA--Just as congress is set to tax fossil fuels out of the U.S.
economy, the New York Times has reasserted its utterly foolish demand
that we tear out existing hydroelectric dams--the dams that provide
most of our renewable energy in the form of water-generated
electricity..
Hydroelectric dams produce 8.5 percent of our power, and it's all
carbon-free. That's nearly five times the deliveries from our erratic
solar panels and wind turbines. Now we're supposed to tear out
hydroelectric dams just as every other key energy source is ripped away
by a rapacious congress?
What in the name of glitzy/ditzy Manhattan is the former "national paper of record" trying to do to the American people?
The Times anguished on July 7th that we've only torn out "only" 430
of the nation's evil river-killing dams. It specifically mentions
tearing down four power dams on the lower Snake River. The reason? The
Times says that will "protect salmon on the West Coast."
Nonsense. Hasn't Andrew Revkin, the Times' science writer, heard yet
about the Pacific Decadal Oscillation discovered in 1996? Salmon
numbers dropped radically in the Columbia after 1977-- as the salmon
catch surged upward in the Gulf of Alaska. The ocean currents had
redistributed the fish food in the open ocean, delivering the food
species to different destinations in a 50-60 year cycle that shows up
brilliantly in the salmon catch records of both fisheries. The PDO also
impacts catches of halibut, sardines, anchovies and other fish
Pacific-wide. The fish species weren't in danger, though some of the
fishermen's livelihoods were.
Last
week or so I watched a documentary on one of the Hitler Channel's
about a recent dam removal in Washington, or maybe Oregon or Idaho, I
forget. The project engineer was the same man who just ten years
earlier had overseen its restoration He did such a fine job
that removing it created unique and difficult problems.
During interviews, said engineer, while careful not to say as
much, was obviously (through his body language and voice inflection)
wanting to scream "What the bloody hell are these assholes doing?"
We've got a bunch of the loonies out here the Pacific Northwest wanting to tear out the some of the dams on the Snake River and on the Columbia "to save the fish".
I believe that if these dams are torn out, then those who are advocating for their removal do without the electricity they provide, regardless of where they live, near the dams or across the various states. Having the courage of their convictions, as it were.
I've been in each and every one of those Dams. That's what my father does, is rebuild Hydro Turbines from the ground up. Dams create year round jobs for hundreds of people, and temporary (but long, usually 1-9 years) jobs to rebuild them, as contractors. The government or Corps of Engineers jobs are high paying with benefits (high five liberals) and the temporary ones are higher paid than that.
Flood control is obviously a major issue. You take out Dams anywhere, especially on the snake, and you're in trouble. A bunch of little towns, including Twin Falls, Burley, Idaho Falls and probably Pocatello, would be underwater.
But, hey, Idaho went for McCain last year, didn't it?
And just as a side note. Half of the dams that are removed, are removed because they're high risk for accidents and what not. I remember talking to someone when I was younger, his name escapes me, but he says that the cost of regular 'maintenance' (which is more like an overhaul) is something a lot of privately owned Dams are not willing to undertake, because they don't know the political life expectancy of their power stations.
Why sink money into something the dumbasses are just going to force you to tear down later.
It's a bit hard to tell. If the palm is out toward the viewer, then it's the V for victory sign. If the palm is toward the person doing the signing, then it's the Brit version of the finger.
He said it much more succinctly: “ Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it on to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children what it was once like in the United States when men were free.” - Ronald Reagan 1961 GrinfilledCelt
Ooh, another good one: “Inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government…and freedom is close to slipping from our grip.” - Ronald Reagan 1964 GrinfilledCelt
Wow! I miss him so much - I identify with his views and the method of imparting them into our kids. Too bad so many have no REAL appreciation AND living of our freedom and the American ideal. It is NOT a fantasy - we had it and it is slipping thru our fingers. I want to just cry when I see how these assclowns keep trying to kill and eradicate everything related to our freedoms.
The article is a fascinating read, the story behind the publishing of
the book is no less than amazing on its own. It made me sit up a little
straighter, it made my fingers twitch, the activist in me was
re-activated and I once again wanted to do something to stop this
stupidity. And that's just from reading the article. I'd probably go
nuts if I read the book.
I got the John Holdren piece too. People who contribute to social deterioration??? If we start with democraps, lawyers and politicians in general, I see no real problem with a limited program. Stop it somewhere after TV newsmen and newspaper publishers.
Maybe Kirk feels threatened because bloggers ripped him to pieces for this treachery.
We've gone past the cross road. They're not even pretending anymore,
and haven't tried to since the election. Only one winner coming out of
this shebang ... the United States, or the current government. Meant in the good way.
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."
~Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
"Most certainly, individuals like Mark Kirk, are aware of the bill's ramifications. Kirk cannot claim he was unaware of what HR2454 stood for. Kirk cannot claim HR2454 adheres to Republican principles of smaller government and less taxation. Therefore, the question must be asked: Why is Mark Kirk in the Republican Party? Better yet, it can be queried: How fast can Illinois Republicans get him out of the GOP?" I wish the GOP would force all the RINOs out, even if it gives the Donks a super-majority. Then maybe the Packs can go back to being Republicans the American people will realize what ruinous jackasses the Donks really are. GrinfilledCelt
Rog does you personal "Buff" have the ability to wipe out an entire state? If there are some mods you need or maybe an A-dapter kit, I'll come over with some Jim Beam and we'll bolt er up. I think the whole Land O Lincoln, is kind of stinkin.
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."
~Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
Today is my birthday. As my birthday wish, I hope that every sailer, airman, soldier, Marine, Coastie, CIA agent gets to feel the joy displayed in that photo very soon. What the give to us can never be justly compensated.
"When Mommy comes marching home again." If that don't bring a tear of appreciation to the corner of your eye then you ain't quite right in the head and you probably voted for Obama.
"I walk ten thousand miles, ten thousand miles, to see you And every gasp of breath, I grabbed it just to find you I climbed up every hill to get to you I wandered ancient lands to hold just you
"and every single step of the way I pay Every single night and day I searched for you through sandstorms and hazy dawns I reached for you
"I'm tired and I'm weak, but I'm strong for you I wanna go home but my love gets me through"
Carson
(CA) has become the latest city to pass an ordinance restricting the
sale of ammunition, prompting an attorney for the National Rifle
Association to threaten to sue.
The ordinance, which was passed unanimously and with little debate
Tuesday night, would apply to two stores in the city: Big 5 Sporting
Goods and Kmart.
The stores will now be required to get permits to sell ammunition, and
collect the name, address and thumbprint of each customer who buys it.
Councilman Mike Gipson introduced the ordinance, which is modeled on a
similar law approved last fall in Los Angeles. It is also up for
consideration in Long Beach, and statewide it has been approved in
about 15 cities.
The
goal is to deter felons and others who are prohibited from possessing
firearms from buying ammunition. Though there are no real-time
background checks for ammunition [continued]
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."
~Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
. Here's the conundrum, as I see it.
Liberals cite opposition to capital punishment with "better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." The corollary in this instance (abortion is another)-you would think- is "Better that ten use guns to ill purpose, than one ounce of freedom is spent to stop them."
That it's not ought manifestly demonstrate the unscrupulous character of this enemy within. A certain physicality is in order ... at some point. .
So, Kalifornia, how's that war on drugs going out there?
What? Legalize pot and tax the heck out of it? Oh that'll work...
How about that war on crime?
What? Permits to buy ammo, and thumbprints of all buyers? Oh, yeah, that's a good idea too...
I say we just make a border fence all the way around the state. That way, they can search every car for ammo going in, and we can check each car for idiots going out.
This is simple intimidation of lawful citizens. There is still no way for anybody could tell if the ammo was bought or ended up in the hands of a criminal. Its just that lawful citizens are not used to being finger-printed and has a stigma attached to it for the uninitiated. After all, "only criminals are finger-printed -- right? Wonder why he didn't throw in taking mug shots of the buyers as well? Why not semen samples and vaginal smears too while you're at it. Let's really intimidate the folks stupid enough to want to protect themselves.
Does the law prohibit importing ammo bought in a neighboring city? What is to prevent a lawful owner of a lawful firearm from going to the next town and buying ammunition?
I thought Big 5 stopped that after the Mendez Brothers gave them a bad name. Look, nothing human lives in Carson. This may be a good thing. Like banning sales in Compton.
France's
President Nicolas Sarkozy and Italy's Silvio Berlusconi steady an
obviously drunk Russian President Dmitri Medvedev. My translator at the
G8 Conference says Medvedev was celebrating his agreement with Obama
to trade "Secrets of Russian Health Care" in return for Alaska. That's what he
told me. What a bastard that Obama is, wot?
Former Maryland Governor Robert Ehrlich and his wife Kendel have a Saturday morning radio show on WBAL.
I didn't listen to it yesterday, but Mother Superior did, and was agog
over two things. One having to do with how Bob and Kendel mirror
our own discussion re: Obama's election, and his "Cap and Trade"
boondoggle.
“
Bob:
They got what they voted for
Kendel:
Bob and I always disagree here. No they did not know what they voted for. How could they?
”
The
second thing was their revelation, to Mo Sup and prolly 99% of others
who heard it, that among the many little grenades contained in the 400
page Cap'nTrade legislation is a requirement that homeowners bring
their houses up to "Energy guidelines" before they can sell it. Something that will cost the average homeowner thousands of dollars.
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."
~Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
You see where this is going. You can't afford to leave, you will afford to stay and be taxed. Can't afford to be taxed? Gvmnt siezes to sell, raze, fortunate. Whatever return to poor folks. IN the end, less to NO private ownership. Hell, do we really own anything anymore? Juice
oops. that was interrupted by blogspot failure and was irretrievable. What was intended:
Can't afford to leave? Can you afford to continue paying whatever taxes are levied against your property? No? As a Federal law, does DC stake the claim against your property or the state, city, or county? Any way you look at, lesser to none private ownership. OTOH, do any of us really own anything anymore? No great mind here, just another citizen feeling the sandy soil underfoot. Juice
You're absolutely right, Juice, there are only two kinds of Democrats (if you don't count the vast majority of them who just plain don't pay any attention); really, really stupid ones and really, really evil ones and it's the really, really evil ones who are running the show. The Stupid Party needs to wake up fast and realize that we are in an all out, kill or be killed, no rules war; and it isn't against the terrorists. The terrorists are sweet old grannies compared to these bastards. At least they have some sort of rules that bind them.
"No they did not know what they voted for. How could they?" How could they not? All that was required was to listen to any of Obama's speeches and think about it for a few seconds. Most of the stuff we're howling about now are things he repeatedly promised to do during his campaign. The only campaign promises he isn't living up to are the ones that no one ever believed for a second that he would keep, like 'cutting the deficit in half'. He's a lot like BJ Clinton that way.
You didn't know that? That's one of the key sops to the global lying crowd, and the gov's pass key into your house for a looksee. "I'm here for your energy audit (psst - make a note, there's a rifle in the closet over there and I found a pistol under the pillow)... ewww, your microwave is larger that 0.5 cubic feet - that's gotta go; Huh? You're a lifetime member of the DNC - well, don't worry about the microwave then. Lookin' good, seeya later" is how it will go.
Another goody: our personal electricity consumption will be monitored and if we use more energy than we are allotted, we will be charged a super tax or have our electricity shut off.
Erlich took an out of control Dempcrat state and built a budget surplus in one term. His reward was to lose his job to smile and spend O'Malley who never saw a spending program or business tax he didn't love. The peeps got what they wanted. Even with Uncle Sam providing a huge chunk of employment in Prince George and Montgomery Counties, Maryland small businesses and rich people who build business are fleeing the state, and Maryland tax revenue saw its largest monthly decline of the fiscal year in May, with collections down 20 percent compared to the previous year... Hahahahahaha I love it when Smiley O'Malley eats a shit sandwich. Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
IS THE New York Times a law unto itself? When the Times published its
December 16 exposé of the secret National Security Agency
electronic surveillance of al Qaeda-related communications, reporters
James Risen and Eric Lichtblau noted that they had granted anonymity to
the "nearly a dozen current and former officials" who were the sources
for the story. Risen and Lichtblau stated that they had granted these
sources anonymity "because of the classified nature of the program."
Implicit in the Times's rationale is the recognition that leaks of such
classified information are illegal.
That recognition is, of course, correct. Section 793 of the federal
espionage law prohibits authorized persons possessing "information
relating to the national defense which information the possessor has
reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or
to the advantage of any foreign nation . . . " from disclosing it to
persons not entitled to it. Section 798 of the espionage law prohibits
the disclosure of classified communications intelligence activities to
unauthorized persons "in any manner prejudicial to the safety or
interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign
government to the detriment of the United States . . . " The violation
of these statutes is a felony. Because their disclosures to the Times
may fall within these statues, the "current and former government
officials" referred to in the Risen/Lichtblau story sought the promise
of confidentiality from the Times to protect their identity.
”
I'm
not sure how many joined me in the view that Pinch Sulzberger and Times
mack-a-mucks ought be tried and executed as a timely and warranted
national security marker, but there were some. Ultimately,
it was the failure of the Bush DOJ to prosecute the TIMES traitors, allowing them to escape scot free and sin another day. Which is today. [U.S. Wiretapping of Limited Value, Officials Report].
The various subsections of the report at pages 31-36 summarize the
classified reports prepared by each of the Inspectors General
individually. I thought it might be useful simply to cull a few quotes
from these pages that are omitted by Risen and Lichtblau in their story
today. (I am typing these quotes myself from the PDF of the report and
apologize in advance for any errors, typographical or otherwise.)
From the NSA Inspector General assessment (pages 31-32):
Risen and Lichtblau mostly airbrush these assessments out of their
highly selective story today. The reason is obvious. They have a vested
interest in minimizing the damage that their own reporting -- also
unmentioned in today's story -- has done to the national security of
the United States.
Given their own role in this story, the Times shouldn't let Risen and
Lichtblau continue to report on it. They have an obvious conflict of
interest. The conflict is manifested in the lousy job they do fairly
reporting on the IGs' report on the NSA program today. [full]
A thumb in that position when firing a semi-auto will tear it up, sprain it, or break it as the slide comes back at very high speed. You know, pain. It's important to get these things right, since cartoons, TV, and movies are how most people get their marksmanship training. —DougM
America’s
news media have enormous opinion-shaping power. Therefore it’s vital
... to understand how the media work, and especially how they work on
us.
“
OldSpookinteresting
"editorial" I found, its may have some resonance here. Due to the
author I was unsure if it was allowable on the front page, since some
might see this as me proselytizing.
Visual and electronic media, today’s dominant media, need a certain
kind of content. They thrive on brevity, speed, change, urgency,
variety and feelings. But thinking requires the opposite. Thinking
takes time. It needs silence and the methodical skills of logic.
Today’s advances in technology have increased the sources of human
information that the average layperson can access. That’s a good thing.
But they’ve also undermined the intellectual discipline that we once
had when our main tools of communication were books or print
publications. This is not a good development. In fact, it’s a very
dangerous thing in a democracy, which is a form of government that
demands intellectual and moral maturity from its citizens to survive.
Most people who follow the news, for instance, can probably tell you
that about 46 million Americans lack health insurance. But most of
those same people have little or no grasp of the very different reasons
for why 46 million Americans lack health insurance – because that story
gets much less attention.
Thomas Jefferson, writing during his presidency, put the importance of
a free press this way: “ No experiment can be more interesting than
that we are now trying, and which we trust will end in establishing the
fact, that man may be governed by reason and truth. Our first object
should therefore be, to leave open to him all the avenues to truth. The
most effectual hitherto found, is the freedom of the press.”
news organizations can’t have it both ways. They can’t claim to be
impartial guardians of truth in American political life and then act
like celebrity groupies at the same time.
The news media, despite their claims of impartiality, and despite the
good work they often do accomplish, are just as prone to prejudice,
ignorance, bad craftsmanship and tribalism as any other profession. But
unlike other professions, the press has constitutional protections. It
also has real power in shaping how we think, what we think about and
what we like, dislike and ignore. America’s media, including its news
media, are the greatest catechetical syndicate in history. And if that
kind of power doesn’t make us uneasy, it should at least make us alert.
When the press portrays itself as the “tribune of the people,” ensuring
the honesty of the other major institutions in our society through
relentless critical scrutiny – then we need to ask the question, who
scrutinizes the press? Who keeps our news media honest? Who holds them
accountable for humiliating one political candidate while fawning over
another? Nobody elected Brian Williams as the NBC news anchor. And
readers can’t impeach the editor of The New York Times – though some
people I know would find that a happy thought.
What we can do is refuse to be stupid. We can decline to be sandbagged
by our news establishment into thinking that marriage for homosexual
partners is inevitable or an obligation of social justice; or that
Islam and Christianity lead to pretty much the same conclusions about
freedom, society and the nature of the human person; or that the
abortion issue is somehow “settled” when thousands of unborn children
continue to be legally killed everyday.
[Render Unto Caesar that which is Caesar's render unto God that which is God's]
What we owe Caesar above all is honest, vigorous, public moral witness
on abortion and every other vital social issue, whether Caesar likes it
or not. [We need to be] the kind of citizens who demand that our news
media act with the sobriety, integrity, fairness and honesty their
vocation requires.
And Finally ... OldSpookAnd I admit I do tend to proselytize, even if its in a "soft" manner here.
Think of it this way: If you truly believe what you have is the best
means of salvation, and you truly care about those you are with, then
how can you NOT share it, even if only in a soft, gentle fashion? What
does it say of my valuation of you were I to not bother?
Penn (of Penn and Teller), an avowed atheist (who has said "The Bible is Bullshit"), puts it well.
"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."
~Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
I've been lucky to hear Chaput sermonize at Mass here in Golden-a very powerful speaker, us Catholics are lucky to have such a man.
His views on the left dominated media are simply common sense. Anyone that isn't "uneasy"-and I'm far more then that-with, for example, Matthews getting a tingle up his leg and then feeling he has the necessity to let us in on that should be seeing red lights and hearing alarm bells. The list I could make of similar crap from these people would run on for days.
Uneasy? Look around right now and if all you are is uneasy, I want some of what you're taking. MM
Very interesting. Penn Jillette is also a Libertarian and there are a couple of clips of him w/Glenn Beck over at youtube discussing just that. But this Bible story. Wow. If only we trusted God enough to do His will in sharing the Truth instead of adhering to social sensitivities. It took an Atheist to inspire this today. Juice
I have always liked Penn Jillette. He makes me laugh and he makes me think. He has some qualities which are extremely rare in a lefty. For starters, he has brain cells which are connected to each other. This not only allows him to form complete sentences, but also to reject some of the sillier of the usual lefty ideals like the environmental movement. Heck, he's downright intelligent. He even knows that smarmy comments do not a logical argument make. That alone puts him head and shoulders above any other lefty I could name. GrinfilledCelt
Yep, watched it-I respect Penn even though we're on opposite sides here. As for his opinion about prostilizing my religious views, well, I feel most people know what they want to about religion and if they choose to deny the Lord, I'm not going to step in and save them from the truck(as Penn put it)
Now teacher's unions? I will get in any lib's face when I hear them say our schools are doing a good job. On this I'm am downright evangelical. MM
Last
year Italy's Premier Silvio Berlusconi told President Dmitri
Medvedev of Russia that President-elect Barack Obama “has all the
qualities to get along well with you: he’s young, handsome and
suntanned, so I think you can develop a good working
relationship.” OMFG! Snub. Berlusconi said it was a joke; obviously it was. He could have said Obama was an
African-American who can speak understandable English, and is clean. Nobody in the media
complained when Joe Biden said it. Anyway, as snubs go, I'd say
the ball is in
Berlusconi's court after this Obama snob-snub during the G-6
conference. Can I say I'm embarrassed that he's recognized as our
President?
Some of the black elite on Martha's Vineyard where the Uhbama's will be staying for vacation referred to Wookie as a "ghetto girl"; perhaps we peasants can refer to arrogant Barry as that "poseur Precedent", him being just a half breed illegal immigrant and all. Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick
