If
We Took the Constitution Seriously, Obama Would Be Impeached ....
“
|
If the citizens of this
Republic still took the Constitution seriously, Obama would be
impeached for his decision to unilaterally grant amnesty to certain
illegal aliens.
Article 1, Sec. 8 of the Constitution, which enumerates the power of
Congress, states that "Congress shall have the Power To...
establish an [sic] uniform Rule of Naturalization."
Congress has passed numerous laws pertaining to immigration and
naturalization, including laws requiring the deportation of illegals.
The role of the President, according to
Article II, Sec. 3, is to "take Care that the Laws be
faithfully executed." Obama's
refusal to execute Congress's immigration laws (or, for that matter,
Congress's Defense of Marriage Act) is an impeachable offense. Article
II, Sec. 4 states that the President "shall be removed from Office on
Impeachment for... Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and
Misdemeanors." The deliberate failure to enforce valid immigration law
and allow hordes of foreigners to live and work in the U.S. is,
arguably, "treason," and doing so in an election year to appease
Hispanic voters could certainly be considered "bribery."
In theory, Obama could exercise his power in Article II, Sec 2. to
"grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States"
and offer a blanket pardon for all violators of immigration law. He's
not doing that, because he'd certainly lose in November if he did.
(However we should be concerned that if he does lose in November, he'll
do it anyway on his last day in office).*
The upshot of Obama's policy not only to allow hundreds of thousands of
illegals to live and work in the U.S. during a time of 8 to 10%
unemployment, but even worse, since the vast number of illegals we're
talking about are Hispanics eligible for affirmative-action
preferences, to actually get preferential treatment over native-born
Americans.
[American
Thinker cont]
* Suppose
he did issue a blanket pardon. All that would accomplish is to
keep
violators of immigration law from prosecution for those past
violations. It
would not cover the new violations that occur if they continued to
violate the law
— by staying here illegally. Seems to me, anyway.
As to the article's premise (If
We Took the Constitution Seriously,
Obama Would Be Impeached .... ), that we do not take it
seriously is manifestly (50
Impeachable Crimes and Counting) obvious. |
|
” |
|
and the current crop of repugnants wouldn't think of challenging this for fear of the racist and/or re-election spectre.
ReplyDeleteI am apprehensive that Romney will not be any different, if elected.
Well said: Mitch McConnell's (yes, Rino Mitch) recent speech on "Growing threats to our First Amendment"
ReplyDeletehttp://tinyurl.com/8xnxmpx
oy vey ole'
Obama could be impeached but, especially after the ill advised 17th Amendment, conviction is a political process: he would never be convicted. Why distract from the campaign to replace him?
ReplyDeleteFreddie Sykes
Unlike some others (ahem), I'm not a birther. But let's go with it: Didn't he just grant amnesty to his own self so he could be on the ballot in 2012 in Arizona?
ReplyDeleteWhy, Alear, your statement is just plain stup...oh, wait..
ReplyDeleteExcuse me if I'm repeating this story, but last year I wrote to my congress critter, Lady GaGa (Go Along to Get Along) Pearce and asked why nothing was being done to rein in the extra-constitutional activities of teh wun. The reply was that the congress was too busy trying to create jobs for the American pippul to want to mire the government in that kind of battle.
ReplyDeleteHe was unopposed in the primary. I may consider voting for his opponent in the General Election because the man is worse than worthless.
--Skyhawker, Doug
If we took the Constitution seriously, we would NEVER have gotten to where we are now.
ReplyDelete