“
|
Seems Joan Peterson's been throwing around the N-word again, that
four-letter one: "Need".
"[O]ur (Common
Gun [non]Sense)
opponents repeatedly suggest that civilians should not be allowed to
carry firearms for self-defense, a key reason being that civilians
don’t receive sufficient training compared to police. But then when we
seek out the same kind of training as police, they disapprovingly
exclaim, “Who needs ‘tactical firearm training’?”"
I need 'tactical firearm training' because none of your business, Joan,
that's why. [Righteous
Rant Continued]
Joan
Peterson, the proprietor of “CommonGunSense” is a well-known entity to
parts of the gunblogosphere. She’s “Japete”, who practices “reasoned
discourse”, by which is meant selective comment moderation (even
editing).
Hers was not a serious question of “who really needs tactical
training?”, but more “why do they need a gun?”. As I recall, someone
found she’s either on the Brady board, or the board for Joyce as well.
You’re trying to put “reason” where there isn’t any. [comment from HERE]
|
|
” |
I missed the day in Constitutional law when my prof covered what she must view as the Bill of Needs.
ReplyDelete