Are we being scripted?

TEXAS ORDINANCE OF SECESSION

Can we talk?

Remember how excited many of us were over New Hampshire's resolution affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles?  I loved that approach because it was defacto secession, with the onus placed  on the federal gummint for failure to adhere to the constitution.  Alas, a house majority voted to  "Die" rather than "Live Free!"  Anyway, I found the same excitment yesterday, April 1st.  The multitudes, I among them, sprung into full bloom of  manhood over this FreeRepublic post, TEXAS ORDINANCE OF SECESSION(Texas is going for it!)  “ Sooo...what does one have to do to become a citizen of Republic of Texas? Just curious. 5 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:41:17 PM by madison10 To: madison10; xzins Sooo...what does one have to do to become a citizen of Republic of Texas?I was born there. So I can be president. 16 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:46:13 PM by P-Marlowe ” I always felt Texas would be the ideal anchor for a United States reformation movement.  First, they are the only state that was once a country, which imputes to them, in my mind, standing the others lack.  Second, it's big.  Several years ago, in response to forerunners of todays Global-warmist freaks, the Population Bomb-ists, I read a book (?) that demonstrated that the entire Earth population could live in Texas, with  living space more generous than Hong Kong. That's important, because a whole lotta people would be moving there.  Third, Texas offers port facilities.  Fourth, With all it's military bases, it's likely that the new Texas nation would possess nuclear weaponry, which by itself would end any Lincolnesqe response by the Obama jingoists, or others with misplaced  patriotism. Here was an intriguing comment ... “ Well, there’s that Nubian in the fuel supply known as Texas vs White to get around first. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=74&invol=700 To bumper-sticker it, it says that no state has the right to secede once becoming part of the United States. 34 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:59:16 PM by decal (Too many people mistake "tolerance" for "approval.") ” I read much of it, until I thought of something better to do, like take a leak.  STATE OF TEXAS v. WHITE, 74 U.S. 700 (1868)  concerns  unclaimed United States Texan indemnity bonds, issued January 1, 1851, payable in fourteen years, of the denomination of $1000 each, and coupons attached thereto to the amount of $ 1287.50, amounting in the aggregate, bonds and coupons, to the sum of $156, 287.50.  Said bonds had been used to pay a company for war materials, and evidently the long legal hassle conveys to the United States the right to bar secession, something that did not exist in 1861. Whether it does, or does not it seems to me a moot point. As Lincoln proved when he used force of arms to nudge the Confederate States back into the Union, "might makes right." The same holds today. Any state seceding must anticipate a war against such of the United States military that chooses to fight against Freedom, which might just consist entirely of Obama's Brown Shirts.  Interesting, and Invigorating thought. Final thought: The more I think about what's happening, the more I tend to believe that our discontent has been orchestrated.