|
|
|
I think the storm done gathered.
|
scream-of-consciousness; "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell."
|
|
|
I think the storm done gathered.
|
"If the number of Islamic terror attacks continues at the current rate, candlelight vigils will soon be the number-one cause of global warming. " |
This will be the comment box |
USING IT FOR WALLPAPER HERE, BOSS!!!
History will show it is exceptionally bad form to over-reach as you peak politically.
"net neutrality,"
"The Fairness Doctrine"
"work brings freedom"
(Arbeit macht frei)
RAK
If I am reading this "bill" correctly, the "internet" (and it's providers) would be treated in the same fashion as the three major "over the airwaves" television networks (and radio stations) are now? That they would be subject to what ever government guidelines were to be put in place, much like what the FCC does for the above mentioned media outlets?
If this is the case, how does this bill, impact on the individual user? I saw nothing directly stated in the bill (I downloaded a PDF of same and read it. Amazingly, it was not all that long of a bill.) which would force the companies to limit their services. Perhaps I am particularly dense this morning (Not the first time to be sure!), but what am I missing?
Or is this the classic "wolf in sheep's clothing" kind of bill. One which says one thing, but will in short order be "morphed" into something entirely different.
net Neutrality is anything but, You have to remember that it the bill or organization is named something, it is aimed at destroying said thing, ACLU anyone?
Net Neutrality limits your bandwidth and caps how much you can down load, unless you pay to upgrade and you can download more.
keeping it neutral is just how it is now? Right? or am i getting this backwards?
Smart Dog !
http://tinyurl.com/mx28kp
RAK
RAK, Been getting a daily fix on that video for the past week. Ain't it grand, though. :}
Juice