|
If
the Liberal brain was wired to comprehend war, free markets, or Ronald
Reagan, they wouldn't be Liberals. They ought then steer clear of those
areas. An assertion that Renaldo Maximus
could not get elected, let alone get the Republican nomination today,
is as far as any reader needs to go. Unless the reader is looking
to poke the author in the eye with a sharp stick dipped in Obama feces.
Ahem. A commenter here recently attributed to Thomas Sowell this anecdote.
| “
|
When asked what he would like to explain to Liberals, he replied "Nothing because they would not listen anyway."
|
” |
Solder that. Another commenter to this LATIMES revisionist heap, nevertheless gives it a never-say-die try.
Nobel Peace Prize stuff, that.
|
|
Ridiculous premise, George. So what if spending ballooned with Reagan as Governor. When compared with the growth of the state at the time, the increases would be mostly automatic, the remainder being explained by the legislature's penchant for spending. It's always been tough for a California Governor to reign in spending. And, as for spending as President, expanding defense spending leading to the self-destruction of our greatest enemy, the Soviet Union, doesn't count. No matter what, Reagan would still be accused by the liberal media of being asleep at the switch for taking naps and of being a Simpleton for his clear view of 'right and wrong.' If you want to attack a Republican for not being Conservative, any other Republican President in the last generation or two would be a much better choice.