Wednesday, June 23, 2010

_UCK HUCK

And the winner is ...?
Democrats choose the 2012 Republican nominee.

Boned Jello

This came a little earlier than I expected.  In a replay of their successful 2008 tour de farce, the Democrat-media complex is selecting the 2012 Republican candidate for president.  Accordingly, it ...
  1. - must be someone a huge chunk of the party base will, well, blow chunks over. 
  2. - must be someone  they can then destroy after the nomination is secured. 
  3. - must NOT be the one person they fear they most. 
  4. - must pass muster with old guard Vichy Republicans.
Given that criteria,  who will be 2012"s John McCain, if they have their way?  *drum-roll* 

Steve Schmidt, John McCain’s former campaign manager, told me, referring to President Obama, “we should put our most articulate guy. Huckabee’s that guy.” Schmidt, who has traded barbs with Palin since the election, said, “There’s no one who really provides a better contrast to Sarah Palin, showing her as an entertainer instead of a serious thinker—and there’s not enough oxygen for both of them.”


10 comments:

Gayle Miller said...

Steve Schmidt is an ass!

molonlabe28 said...

I like the term Vichy Republicans a lot.

Are you implying that we should barbecue Republican consultants and other hacks who led the party to irrelavance?

Surely not.

Who would think of such a thing?

What would that taste like?

What bothers me a lot is the fact that Republican candidates (e.g. Tim Pawlenty, if I recall correctly) go back to the same tired old retread consultants/hacks and seek better results than they have historically garnered.

And who would want Schmitt for anything?

These guys (like Schmitt) remind me too much of Mitch McConnell, Charles Grassley, Lamar Alexander, Bob Corker and pretty much most of the existing GOP Senators.

I am tired of seeing them barter away pieces of the Consitution and my values.

It's time to put their Senate pensions into service.

Josh Fahrni-Barn Army Dog Catcher said...

Wont be Huck. Wont be Palin. Won't be Gingrich. Wont be Paul (snort). You know this. If it's any of them it will be 4 more years of 'Bama.

Anonymous said...

Steve Schmitt? Yeah he's the guy I'm going to give credence to.

Like they say, it's a fluid situation but right now I love Christie-Frank said he's like Reagan ate Limbaugh. If he ran, it would prove, hopefully forever, that when we run a solid conservative, we always win.

I'm with Josh on his "it won't bes" too.
MM

Trialdog said...

Hey guys, don't limit your thinking on this. Recall the new standards. It is not necessary the candidate be an American (at least the candidate needn't be able to prove it), have any executive, business, or managerial experience, show his medical, school or passport records, or even be able to speak extemporaneously. Hell, he/she/it can be a complete robotic moron so long as he/she/it can read a teleprompter. Just pick someone who likes this country please. I'll vote for that person.

Rodger the Real King of France said...

I'm convinced that Sarah would win, and win big. This is not the same deer Katie Couric caught in her headlights - on her first very first campaign interview. Sarah has qualities this nation needs desperately; to wit:

1. She's the antithesis of every Republican presidential nominee since 1980.

2 She has star power that matches Obama's

3 She has integrity that no Democrat nominee, I don't care who it is, will come close to duplicating, and it comes through.

4. Sarah has so far championed 12 Republican nominees, most of them unknown Tea Party types - like Tim Scott and Nikki Haley who won in South Carolina yesterday, against establishment opponents. That makes her 9-3. So what? So plenty. Sarah's endorsement has weight, and that means she's respected, despite what you-know-who would have you believe.

There's a reason the media are still going after her 24/7. They're scared to death of her. Yes, scared to death about how she'd perform as president. That would be 180° from Barry. Now, all the other have their supporters, but none with the enthusiasm and energy of Palin's. My opinion.

OregonGuy said...

That she can rattle pots and pans while directing negotiations with multi-national corporations is frightening to the Left. The common sense and common roots of Truman, with the logic and leadership of Reagan. She is unafraid of American Exceptionalism, that the United States must lead. 'Cause you either lead or you follow, right?
.

Anonymous said...

I think the Repubs should nominate Barry before the dems have a chance at him. Then when we get beat we will at least know why.

WV: flosin ha ha ha

Chris said...

What say we invite the denizens of the local mosque over for beer and barbeque?
Ya know, just to be neighborly...

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Inviting Islamos to a BBQ would end up looking like THIS

.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.