Friday, March 18, 2011

Democrats Fighting the Constitution

'Splain this Lucy
   'Birther Bill' Stalls at the Gold Dome

  The measure would force candidates for president and vice president to certify their citizenship with the Georgia secretary of state's office before going on the ballot in the state.

Democratic state Representative Glenn Baker of Jonesboro said he did not fully understand the bill's ramifications when he signed it and quickly removed his name.

Barry Graduates from Columbia in 1988

Several states have pending legislation requiring future candidates for president and vice president  to provide legal proof of their constitutional qualifications for that office.   The question then is, who in bloody hell can argue against enacting?  Srsly.  This is a proposal that in other words says "all in favor of following the law say aye."  That this is even issue ought be mind boggling to everyone, and yet, like here in Georgia, Democrats are fighting it. 
  • Glenn Baker of Jonesboro said he did not fully understand the bill's ramifications when he signed it and quickly removed his name.
There can be just one ramification (help me out here).  That this requirement will show that President Barack Obama is unable to produce lawful proof of his citizenship.  Democratic state Representative Glenn Baker of Jonesboro, in other times,  would be led to the town square, where 50 lashes would be laid upon his bare back.  And justifiably so. 

Because this is not going away (See Donald Trump and others). 

What I'm asking here is this.  If any of you have knowledge of reasons being given for not passing this common sense requirement, please share with us in the comments.  I am truly, really, interested in hearing them.


11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dems don't want to admit there is an elephant (not the Republican symbol either)in the room.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick

Rodger the Real King of France said...

I know Dick, but I want to hear actual reasons being given for not supporting this initiative. Quotes.

Ole Phat Stu said...

As far as GOP candidates are concerned, I would suggest the have to pass a general knowledge and sanity test ;-)

Gayle Miller said...

We have to produce our birth certificate to get a damned driving license for goodness sakes! We need to identify ourselves for any number of reasons as we wend our way through our lives. Why should this be the slightest bit different? Because it's goring Barry's wetback ox?

bocopro said...

I can think of several reasons why such a requirement should not be levied on candidates, all of which are secondary to the biggie:

Because it would be R-A-A-A-A-C-I-S-T.

So that's settled, then . . . n'est ce-pas?

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Someone has used that?

Rodger the Real King of France said...

My point is that while these bills are stuttering along amidst Democrat opposition, I have yet to read any argument about why this is a bad idea?.

Anonymous said...

I love Gayle. And Juice.

Anonymous said...

Rodger, I haven't heard a legitimate reason voiced, but I'm sure the Dems have offered the usual lame excuses such as it would inconvenience some people, like having to show photo ID before being allowed to vote. As Gayle said, it would be racist, disproportionally handicap the underprivileged, the brown skins, the poor, yadda yadda yadda.
If I had my druthers, such an office holding and voting requirement should go beyond that, because it is relatively easy to forge such documents.
I'd like to see a requirement for sworn testimony, much like a chain of custody in evidence, where the candidate/voter to be must produce witnesses that will swear they knew me when and where and who my parents were, etc.
Lt. Col. Gen. Tailgunner dick

Cheesy said...

Answer:
Barry plans on running again in 2012.

Anonymous said...

You're actual real answer:

BC would require name of mother/father. Obama is not the only liar in the liar's club.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.