Thursday, July 28, 2011

Dem's shortcut to closing wealth gap backfired

Feds' Dem's shortcut to closing wealth gap backfired on minority homeowners
"Did you see the devastating numbers about the wealth of minority families?

Their savings have largely been wiped out. White households now have 20 times more wealth than black households and 18 times more wealth than Hispanic households."


There are various reasons. But a big one is this: The federal government turned home ownership into an affirmative-action program, complete with quotas. And a lot of people who had no business buying houses bought them and then lost them.

"As sad as it is to say, this began in the Clinton Administration as a response to the argument that the poor and minorities couldn't get credit and were being left out of the home-ownership dream," says James Wright, a sociology professor at University of Central Florida. "They couldn't meet credit requirements. There was a lot of pressure in progressive circles" to change those requirements.
  [Full]
House on Stilts
Holy Crap! Orlando Sentinal columnist Mike Thomas comes closeer to articulating the truth about this as I've seen in print. 

To further this goal, Fannie Mae agreed to buy high-risk subprime loans in 1999. This meant lenders could sell the loans to unqualified buyers and then dump them on Fannie and the taxpayers.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development set a goal that, by 2001, half the portfolios of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae should be composed of loans to low-income and moderate-income buyers.

Once Freddie and Fannie were fully engaged in the subprime business, the market went crazy. Lenders enticed unqualified and unsophisticated borrowers into signing loans they couldn't possibly pay off.

I'll take small victories where I can find them.


3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Except I recall reading that it was the (former) Worst President Evah, Jimmuh, who started this ugly ball rolling. -- Skyhawker Doug

"Sometimes I look at my children and I say to myself: 'Lillian, you should have remained a virgin.'" - Lillian Carter

Rodger the Real King of France said...

Hell, you can trace it all the way back to LBJ, but if you follow this particular debacle back to it's roots it begins with a HUD memo as I recall, followed by a Clinton mandate for affordable housing. The nation will NOT survive the damage inflicted on it by the Clintons, and I include Obama in the list. BUSH 41 had it in his power to indict both of them in 1991 and didn't. What a freaking shame.

molonlabe28 said...

"White households now have 20 times more wealth than black households and 18 times more wealth than Hispanic households."

Who in the hell cares?

Is there some kind of competition going on that I missed?

It's kind of hard to accumulate wealth when substantial portions of a community are in prison, are felons, or are sending all of their spare cash back to their country of origin (aka Mexico).

If you are trying to accumulate wealth (which is apparently what this survey guages), you may want to seriously consider:

a. How many children you have ("0" is an option);

b. How much of your life you plan to be incarcerated;

c. Whether you should use cocaine;

d. Whether you should smoke dope all day long;

e. Whether to take advantage of low interest student loans; and

f. Whether to take advantage of affirmative action programs which add points to your test scores and get you in very nice colleges, grad schools and professional schools.

I certainly considered items a. - e., above.

My answers to items a. and b. were "O".

My answers to items c., d. and e. were "yes".

Because I am a white male, item f. was something I had to contend with and not benefit from.

Post a Comment

Just type your name and post as anonymous if you don't have a Blogger profile.